Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Solano County

Court

Solano County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-04-21
Status Writfinal - Writ Final Disposition
Type Wh - Writ of Habeas CORPUS
Docket 8 entries

Parties

Defendant Mitchell F17598, Tyrone
Photo of Hon. Gutierrez Carlos R Stashyn Donna

Judge

Hon. Gutierrez Carlos R Stashyn Donna

Solano County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. WRIT (NO FEE)
  2. FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. MAILED LETTER OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO PETITIONER. COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER SENT TO D-9. EMAIL TO JA AND STAFF ATTORNEY/ WDSP
  3. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
  4. FILED JUDGE GUTI'S ORDER DATED: 06-16-2022 DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND SERVED ON PETITIONER. ENDORSED COPY TO D - 9. // JSAV
  5. DOCUMENT FILED
  6. RECEIVED AND FILED PETITIONER'S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S RULING ON JUNE 16, 2022, PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION: 1008 WITH MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES AND AUTHORITIES // EMAILED TO JA AND STAFF ATTORNEY //JSAV
  7. DOCUMENT FILED
  8. RECEIVED AND FILED PETITIONER'S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S RULING ON JUNE 16, 2022, PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION: 1008 WITH MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES AND AUTHORITIES // EMAILED TO JA AND STAFF ATTORNEY //JSAV

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix and motion outcomes. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more