Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-22
Type Dissolution Of Marriage Pro Se
Docket 71 entries
Photo of Hon. Sigler Jared P

Judge

Hon. Sigler Jared P

Washington County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
  2. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  3. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  4. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  5. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  7. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  9. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  10. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  11. RESPONDENT'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS (SM)
  12. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER HEARING (SM)
  13. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE (M MEASON FOR RESP)(SM)
  14. RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE AND COUNTERCLAIM TO PETITION FOR
  15. DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE (SM)
  16. ORDER SETTING HEARING (10/31/22 @ 2:00PM)(SM)
  17. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE (C DELAPP FOR PETIT)(SM)
  18. CM:SIGLER-PETIT BY ATTY C DELAPP-RESP BY ATTY M MEASON.
  19. PARTIES REQUEST REFERRAL TO MEDIATION. CRT ORDERS
  20. MEDIATION. MATTER PASSED TO 12.12.22 FOR STATUS OF
  21. MEDIATION. (WG)
  22. ORDER OF REFERRAL TO MEDIATION (12.12.22 @ 2:00PM) (WG)
  23. CM:SIGLER-PETIT BY ATTY C DELAPP-RESP BY ATTY M MEASON.
  24. PARTIES TO ATTEND MEDIATION AND ARE TO APPEAR 01/30/23
  25. AT 2:00 PM FOR REVIEW. (GS)
  26. CM:SIGLER-PETIT NOR ATTY C DELAPP APPEAR AS MR DELAPP
  27. IS ILL-RESP BY ATTY R RAMSEY FOR ATTY M MEASON.
  28. MEDIATION HAS BEEN SCHEDULED. MATTER IS PASSED TO
  29. 04/03/23 AT 2:00 PM FOR REVIEW OF MEDIATION. (GS)
  30. CM:SIGLER-PETIT WITH ATTY C DELAPP-RESP WITH ATTY M
  31. MEASON, PARTIES DID NOT COME TO A DECISION IN MEDIA-
  32. TION. PARTIES ORDERED TO APPEAR 06/22/23 AT 1:30 PM FOR
  33. FINAL HEARING. CRT REPORTER REQUESTED. (GS)
  34. NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL (H EARNHART FOR
  35. PETIT)(SM)
  36. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AS COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER (SM)
  37. PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF "FINAL HEARING"
  38. PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF SCHEDULING ORDER
  39. OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FOR
  40. ENTRY OF THE SAME (SM)
  41. DIEPC: PARTY COMPLETED DIVORCE IMPACT EDUCATIONAL PROG.
  42. AMANDA JENNINGS 5/18/23 (SM)
  43. ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO CONTINUE "FINAL
  44. HEARING" (SM)
  45. ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (8/28/23 @ 2:00PM)
  46. (SM)
  47. CM:SIGLER-PETIT BY ATTY A KEELE-RESP BY ATTY C MORRIS
  48. FOR ATTY M MEASON. PARTIES ORDERED TO ATTEND MEDIATION
  49. AGAIN. MATTER IS PASSED TO 10/02/23 AT 2:00 PM FOR
  50. REVIEW OF MEDIATION. (GS)
  51. CM:SIGLER-MATTER IS PASSED BY AGREEMENT TO 10/23/23 AT
  52. 2:00 PM. (GS)
  53. AGREED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE (SM)
  54. ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE (11/20/23 AT 2:00PM) (SM)
  55. MOTION TO APPOINT GUARDIAN AD LITEM (SM)
  56. ORDER SETTING HEARING ON PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR
  57. GUARDIAN AD LITEM (12/18/23 AT 2:00PM)(SM)
  58. CM:SIGLER-PETIT DOES NOT APPEAR-RESP BY ATTY C MEASON
  59. FOR ATTY M MEASON. MOTION FOR G.A.L. FILED. PARTIES
  60. ORDERED TO ATTEND MEDIATION AND APPEAR FOR REVIEW
  61. 12/18/23 @ 2:00 PM. (GS)
  62. DIEPC: PARTY COMPLETED DIVORCE IMPACT EDUCATIONAL PROG.
  63. GARY R JENNINGS 6/21/23 (SM)
  64. RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO
  65. APPOINT GUARDIAN AD LITEM (SM)
  66. CM:SIGLER-PETIT BY ATTY A KEELE-RESP WITH ATTY C MEASON
  67. FOR ATTY M MEASON. PARTIES ORDERED TO APPEAR 02/07/24
  68. AT 1:30 PM FOR HEARING ON THE MOTION TO APPOINT G.A.L.
  69. (GS)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more