Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-09-30
Type Injunction Dismissed
Docket 49 entries
Photo of Hon. Gardner, Orable Joseph M.

Judge

Hon. Gardner, Orable Joseph M.

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FILE & ENTER PETITION
  2. LAW LIBRARY
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION
  4. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  5. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  6. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  7. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  9. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  11. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  12. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  13. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  14. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  15. APPLICATION FOR TEMOPORARY INJUNCTION
  16. SUMMONS ISSUED TO ATTY FOR SERVICE BY PROCESS SERVER
  17. ORDER FOR HEARING SUPPLEMENT TO APPLICATION FOR
  18. TEMPORARY INJUNCTION
  19. RETURN OF SUMMONS
  20. RETURN OF SUMMONS
  21. CM: R JOHNSON CR; JUDGE GARDNER PRESIDING. PLAINTIFF
  22. WILLIAM C HORN PRESENT WITH ATTY JOT HARTLEY.
  23. DEFENDANT'S JAMES MONROE AND WATHENA MONROE PRESENT PRO
  24. SE. ATTY JOT HARTLEY REQUESTS THE RULE OF
  25. SEQUESTRATION. COURT ENVOKES THE RULE OF SEQUESTRATION.
  26. ATTY HARTLEY CALLS WILLIAM C HORN, SWORN. TESTIMONY
  27. GIVEN. PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBITS 1,2,3,6,7,8 AND 9 ENTERED
  28. INTO EVIDENCE WITH NO OBJECTIONS. PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBITS
  29. 4&5 ADMITTED OVER OBJECTION. ARGUMENTS HEARD. DEF
  30. WATHENA MONROE SWORN AND TESTIMONY GIVEN. COURT ORDERS
  31. TEMPORARY INJUNCTION. NO OBJECTIONS FROM DEFENDANT.
  32. DEF IS ORDERED TO KEEP CATTLE OFF OF PLAINTIFF'S LAND.
  33. PLAINTIFF REQUESTS PROVISION FOR SHERIFF TO ENFORCE
  34. THE TERMS OF THE INJUNCTION. COURT APPROVES PLAINTIFF'S
  35. REQUEST. ATTY JOT HARTLEY TO PREPARE ORDER.
  36. ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY INJUCTION
  37. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  38. ANSWER
  39. MOTION TO ENTER SCHEDULING ORDER
  40. ORDER FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
  41. SCHEDULING ORDER
  42. DEFENDANT'S FINAL WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LISTS
  43. MOTION TO WITHDRAW
  44. ORDER
  45. COURT MINUTE OF 9-06-2023: CM: NO CR: JUDGE GARDNER PREDISING. PLAINTIFF PRESENT BY ATTY JOT HARTLEY. DEF'S PRESENT PROSE. PRE-TRIAL STRICKEN. CASE SET FOR STATUS ON 10-11-2023 @ 10:00 AM
  46. CM; NO CR; JUDGE GARDNER PRESIDING. JOT HARTLEY PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF. JAMES AND WATHENA MONROE PRESENT PRO SE. MEDIATION ORDERED WITHIN 90 DAYS. MEDIATION PAPERWORK PROVIDED TO BOTH PARTIES IN OPEN COURT. PRE TRIAL TO BE RESET UPON APPLICATION. ATTY JOT HARTLEY TO PREPARE ORDER.
  47. ORDER FOR MEDIATION
  48. RETURN OF DISPOSITION DKT MAILED TO JAMES MONROE RETURN TO SENDER
  49. RETURN OF DISPOSITION DKT MAILED TO WATHENA MONROE RETURN TO SENDER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more