Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-07-05
Type Arbitration
Docket 36 entries
Disposition dismissed

Parties

Plaintiff Egs Inc, tankco M.e.p.,
Defendant Unifirst Holdings Inc,
Photo of Hon. Strubhar Khristan K

Judge

Hon. Strubhar Khristan K

Canadian County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE FILED
  2. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  3. ARBITRATION
  4. DISPUTE MEDIATION FEE
  5. PETITION
  6. LAW LIBRARY FEE
  7. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
  8. OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  9. OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  10. SHERIFF'S SERVICE FEE FOR COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  11. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  12. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION
  13. STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  14. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS
  15. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $5 COLLECTIONS
  16. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  17. COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE
  18. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
  19. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER FILED
  20. OCIS HAS AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED JUDGE MCCURDY, JACK TO THIS CASE.
  21. ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO AC09-CARD ALLOCATION
  22. ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES REDUCED BY THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS: CV-2022-204: AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE -$0.25 CV-2022-204: AC81 LENGTHY TRIAL FUND -$0.25 CV-2022-204: AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND -$0.63 CV-2022-204: AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND -$0.03 CV-2022-204: AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS -$0.02 CV-2022-204: AC64 DISPUTE MEDIATION FEES CIVIL ONLY -$0.18 CV-2022-204: AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND -$0.04 CV-2022-204: AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES -$0.13 CV-2022-204: AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND -$0.02 CV-2022-204: AC23 LAW LIBRARY FEE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL -$0.15 CV-2022-204: AC01 CLERK FEES -$3.72
  23. RECEIPT # 2022-707482 ON 07/05/2022. PAYOR: LUNDAY/MICHAEL D TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 216.64. LINE ITEMS: CV-2022-204: $146.28 ON AC01 CLERK FEES. CV-2022-204: $5.42 ON AC09 CARD ALLOCATIONS. CV-2022-204: $5.85 ON AC23 LAW LIBRARY FEE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL. CV-2022-204: $0.64 ON AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND. CV-2022-204: $4.87 ON AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES. CV-2022-204: $1.51 ON AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND. CV-2022-204: $6.82 ON AC64 DISPUTE MEDIATION FEES CIVIL ONLY. CV-2022-204: $0.43 ON AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS. CV-2022-204: $0.95 ON AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND. CV-2022-204: $24.37 ON AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND. CV-2022-204: $9.75 ON AC81 LENGTHY TRIAL FUND. CV-2022-204: $9.75 ON AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE.
  24. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  25. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE FILED
  26. UNIFIRST'S ANSWER RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND COUNTERMOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION FILED
  27. COURT REPORTER FEE-TRIAL ON MERITS
  28. SUBPOENA SERVED FILED
  29. EMERGENCY TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER FILED
  30. RECEIPT # 2022-708649 ON 07/18/2022. PAYOR: MATTHEW DAVIS TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 20.00. LINE ITEMS: CV-2022-204: $20.00 ON AC01 CLERK FEES.
  31. CRT MIN. MATTER CAME ON BEFORE THIS COURT FOR A MOTION FOR AN INJUNCTION. BOTH PARTIES APPEARED, AS WELL AS THE CLIENTS FOR THE DEFT, ALSO APPEARED. WITNESSES WERE SWORN. TESTIMONY WAS RECEIVED. AT THE CONCLUSION, THE COURT HEARD CLOSING ARGUMENTS FROM THE PARTIES. BASED ON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, THE BRIEFS AND RESPONSES FILED, AND THE CLOSING ARGUMENT OF THE ATTORNEYS, THE COURT FINDS THAT AN INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ENTERED TO STAY ANY ARBITRATION IN THIS CASE. THE COURT IS NOT CONVINCED THAT A VALID, ENFORCEABLE CONTRACT WAS ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE PARTIES. THE COURT IS NOT MAKING THAT FINDING BY THIS RULING. BUT SIMPLY, THE COURT IS FINDING THAT THE COURT IS NOT SATISFIED THAT IT HAS BEEN PROVEN THAT ONE IS, OR WAS ENTERED INTO. AND THEREFORE, BASED ON THE ARBITRATION STATUTES FOR THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, THE COURT IS GOING TO STAY THE ARBITRATION PENDING FURTHER EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE. BASED ON THE GRANTING OF THE INJUNCTION TO THE PLAINTIFF, THE COURT IS ORDERING A $25,000.00 BOND BE POSTED, AS PER STATUTE, BY THE PLAINTIFF. JUDGE JACK MCCURDY
  36. ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FILED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more