Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Hartford County

Court

Hartford County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-12-28
Type T90 - Torts - All Other
Docket 37 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Vincent Nettis|nicholas Nettis|philip Nettis
Defendant All-Gas and Equipment Company, INC.|PATRICIA A. Deegan Executrix of the Estate of Patsy P. Nettis and Salley-Marie Nettis|river Valley Oil Service, LLC|PAUL G. CANAL Aka Paul G. CANAL-ZEVALLOS

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. ADDITIONAL PARTIES PAGE
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. APPEARANCE
  6. NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES
  7. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  8. ORDER
  9. MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
  10. APPEARANCE
  11. ORDER
  12. TRANSFERRED FROM SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX
  13. TRANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD
  14. ORDER
  15. MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO AMEND MOTION OR PLEADING
  16. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT FOR APPORTIONMENT AS SERVED CGS SEC 52-102b
  17. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT FOR APPORTIONMENT AS SERVED CGS SEC 52-102b
  18. MOTION TO CORRECT
  19. ORDER
  20. REQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  21. MOTION TO CORRECT
  22. ORDER
  23. REQUEST FOR ADJUDICATION COMPLEX LITIGATION (JD-CL-77)
  24. APPEARANCE
  25. APPEARANCE
  26. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  27. REQUEST TO REVISE
  28. APPEARANCE
  29. OBJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE
  30. AMENDED COMPLAINT
  31. APPEARANCE
  32. AMENDED COMPLAINT
  33. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  34. NOTICE
  35. NOTICE
  36. MOTION TO STRIKE
  37. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more