Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-02-16
Type Merchandise
Docket 57 entries
Disposition Post Judgment
Photo of Hon. Reilly Maxey P

Judge

Hon. Reilly Maxey P

Okfuskee County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. ISSUE AFFIDAVIT OF CLAIM/ORDER UP TO $5000.
  2. LAW LIBRARY ASSESSMENT
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION ASSESSMENT
  4. RETURN/AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE-NO SERVICE
  5. ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED
  6. MINUTE ORDER-PLAINTIFF APPEARS IN PERSON, PRO SE.
  7. DEFENDANT HAS NOT BEEN FOUND AND SERVED. THE COURT
  8. AUTHORIZES AN ALIAS SUMMONS BE ISSUED UPON PAYMENT OF
  9. THE FEE AND RE-SETS THE CASE FOR 4-12-22 AT 9:30 AM
  10. RETURN/AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  11. JUDGMENT
  12. APPLICATION FOR HEARING ON ASSETS (POST JUDGMENT)
  13. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM ASSASSMENT
  14. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  15. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  16. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  17. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  18. ***JUDGMENT MUST BE ON FILE FOR 10 (TEN) DAYS***
  19. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  20. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  21. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  22. ISSUE CITATION (ORDER) TO APPEAR AND ANSWER AS TO
  23. ASSETS
  24. RETURN OF SERVICE - CITATION TO APPEAR - SERVED -
  25. DAKOTA MURRISON
  26. MINUTE ORDER-THE COURT ORDERED DEFENDANT TO REAPPEAR
  27. 6-14-22 AT 9:30AM WITH THE REQUESTED DOCUMENTS.
  28. MINUTE ORDER-THE COURT SETS A PAYMENT REVIEW FOR
  29. 10-25-22 AT 9:30AM. PARTIES ARE RECOGNIZED BACK TO THAT
  30. DATE AND TIME
  31. MINUTE ORDER - PAYMENT REVIEW - PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT
  32. EACH APPEAR IN PERSON, PRO SE. PLAINTIFF ADVISES THE
  33. COURT THAT DEFENDANT HAS PAID A TOTAL OF $145.00 SINCE
  34. THE LAST REVIEW ON 6-15-2022 AT WHICH TIME HE AGREED TO
  35. PAY $300.00 ON THE 15TH OF EACH MONTH. PLAINTIFF
  36. REPORTS THAT NO PAYMENT WAS RECEIVED IN JULY, AUGUST OR
  37. SEPTEMBER. THE COURT SETS A PAYMENT REVIEW FOR
  38. 12-13-2022 AT 9:30 A.M. DEFENDANT IS TO HAVE MADE AT
  39. LEAST A $300.00 PAYMENT BY THAT TIME. PARTIES ARE
  40. RECOGNIZED BACK TO THAT DATE AND TIME
  41. MINUTE ORDER-PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT EACH APPEAR IN
  42. PERSON, PRO SE. PLAINTIFF ADVISES THE COURT THAT THE
  43. CURRENT OUTSTANDING BALANCE IS $1,231.00. DEFENDANT
  44. MADE A $100.00 PAYMENT IN NOVEMBER AND A $100.00
  45. PAYMENT FOR DECEMBER SINCE THE LAST REVIEW ON 10-25-22
  46. AT WHICH TIME HE WAS ORDERED TO HAVE PAID ATLEAST
  47. $300.00 BY TODAY'S HEARING. THE COURT ORDERS DEFENDANT
  48. TO MAKE A PAYMENT OF AT LEAST $100.00 BY THE 15TH OF
  49. EACH AND EVERY MONTH. THE NEXT REVIEW IS 4-25-23 AT
  50. 9:30 AM. PARTIES ARE RECOGNIZED BACK TO THAT DATE AND
  51. TIME.
  52. ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING.
  53. ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING
  54. MINUTE ORDER- PLAINTIFF FTA / DEF. PRO SE (VIA VIDEO)
  55. PAYMENT REVIEW. PLAINTIFF DOES NOT APPEAR AND HAS NOT
  56. CONTACTED THE COURT. DEF APPEARS VIRTUALLY. THE PAYMENT
  57. REVIEW IS STRICKEN. NO FURTHER COURT DATES ARE SET AT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more