Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Hartford County

Court

Hartford County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-04-06
Type T 12 Torts Defective Premises Public Other
Docket 35 entries
Disposition judgment of dismissal

Parties

Plaintiff Verner Rismay
Defendant City Of Hartford
Photo of Hon. Stuart Rosen

Judge

Hon. Stuart Rosen

Hartford County (CT)

Connecticut

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. UDGMENT OF DISMISSAL RESULT: HON STUART ROSEN
  2. OMPLAINT
  3. PPEARANCE Appearance
  4. ETURN OF SERVICE
  5. OTICE Notice of Issuance of Interrogatories and Request for Production
  6. OTION TO STRIKE RESULT: Denied 9/30/2024 HON STUART ROSEN
  7. RDER RESULT: Order 8/2/2024 HON SUSAN COBB
  8. RDER RESULT: Denied 9/30/2024 HON STUART ROSEN
  9. EMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
  10. CHEDULING ORDER BY AGREEMENT C50,T02,T03,T11,T12,T61,V01,V04, V09 CASES RESULT: Order 6/13/2022 HON SUSAN COBB
  11. RDER RESULT: Order 6/13/2022 HON SUSAN COBB
  12. RDER TMC Order RESULT: Order 6/13/2022 HON SUSAN COBB
  13. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Strike
  14. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Strike
  15. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE of 08/19/2024 Remote Motion to Strike Hearing RESULT: Granted 8/16/2024 HON STUART ROSEN
  16. RDER RESULT: Granted 8/16/2024 HON STUART ROSEN
  17. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 8/28/2024 HON SUSAN COBB
  18. RDER RESULT: Granted 8/28/2024 HON SUSAN COBB
  19. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 9/6/2024 HON STUART ROSEN
  20. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/6/2024 HON STUART ROSEN
  21. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE of 09/09/2024 Remote Short Calendar Motion- Other Hearing RESULT: Granted 9/6/2024 HON STUART ROSEN
  22. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/6/2024 HON STUART ROSEN
  23. BJECTION TO MOTION Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Motion to Strike with Memorandum of Law
  24. XHIBITS Exhibit A, see entry #112.00
  25. RDER RESULT: Order 10/31/2024 HON SUSAN COBB
  26. CHEDULING ORDER BY AGREEMENT C50,T02,T03,T11,T12,T61,V01,V04, V09 CASES
  27. OTION TO DISMISS PB 10-30
  28. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/27/2025 HON STUART ROSEN
  29. EMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
  30. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, see 116.00
  31. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RESULT: Withdrawn 4/9/2025 BY THE PLAINTIFF
  32. ITHDRAWAL OF MOTION
  33. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
  34. BJECTION TO MOTION Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, see entry 116.00
  35. EMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more