Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-09
Type Protective Order In County
Docket 74 entries
Disposition Disposal
Photo of Hon. Thomas Linda S

Judge

Hon. Thomas Linda S

Nowata County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. FILE & ENTER PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  2. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  3. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  4. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  5. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  6. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  7. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  8. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  9. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  10. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  11. SHERIFF FEE
  12. EMERGENCY EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER, ISSUED W/NOTICE OF
  13. HEARING 3-22-22 @ 2PM(JAD)
  14. CM:VACLAW-PLTF PRO SE-DEFT APPEARS NOT DUE TO NO
  15. SERVICE. CRT CONSOLIDATES MATTER W/FD-22-16 AND SETS
  16. MATTER FOR HEARING 3/25/22 @ 9:00AM W/JUDGE FRANKS.
  17. ALIAS ISSUED. (KM)
  18. COURT MINUTE FILED (KM)
  19. ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE AND EXTENSION OF EMERGENCY EX-
  20. PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER & ALIAS SUMMONS TO DEFENDANT(S) (
  21. (KM)
  22. CM:FRANKS BY BAILIFF HARPER- HEARING SET FOR 3.25.22 @
  23. 9:00AM IS PASSED BY AGREEMENT TO 4.1.22 @ 9:00AM. TERMS
  24. OF EPO TRAILING FD-22-16 REMAIN IN FULL FORCE & EFFECT.
  25. (WG)
  26. ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE & EXTENSION OF EX-PARTE
  27. PROTECTIVE ORDER (4.1.22 @ 9:00AM) (WG)
  28. CM:FRANKS BY BAILIFF HARPER-PER AGREEMENT OF BOTH
  29. SIDES; MATTER SET FOR 4.1.22 @ 9:00AM IS CONTINUED TO
  30. 5.13.22 @ 9:00AM. THIS EPO TRAILING FD-22-16 SHALL BE
  31. IN FULL FORCE & EFFECT. (WG)
  32. COURT MINUTE FILED (WG)
  33. ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE & EXTENSION OF EX-PARTE
  34. PROTECTIVE ORDER (5.13.22 @ 9:00AM) (WG)
  35. REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT W/CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
  36. ATTACHED (COPY/ORIG FD-22-16)(SM)
  37. ORDER OF ASSIGNMENT (LINDA THOMAS) (6/2/22 @ 1:30PM)
  38. (SM) (COPY/ORIG FD-22-16)
  39. PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE HEARING ON RESPONDENT'S
  40. PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (SM) (COPY
  41. ORDER SETTING EXPEDITED HEARING ON RESPONDENT'S
  42. PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (5/18/22 @ 2:00PM)(SM)
  43. (COPY)
  44. CM:THOMAS-PETIT BY ATTY K JONES-DEFT W/ATTY D
  45. KEESLING AND D STANTON. MATTER COMES ON FOR HEARING
  46. ON EPO. DEFT OBJECTS CONTINUANCE OF EPO HEARING AND
  47. TO MOTION TO CONTINUE OUT OF TIME IN FD-22-16 &
  48. PO-22-47. DEFT FEELS THIS IS A PLOY TO PROLONG CASE.
  49. ARGUMENTS HEARD BY EACH PARTY. PARTIES HAVE AGREED TO
  50. A MUTUAL NO CONTACT ORDER TO BE FILED IN FD-22-16 AND
  51. DISMISSING PO. ORDER TO BE DRAWN UP AND PRESENTED TO
  52. COURT FOR APPROVAL. FEES FOR PO WILL BE WAIVED. (SM)
  53. MOTION TO FILE RESPONSE OUT OF TIME (COPY/ORIG
  54. FD-22-16) (SM)
  55. SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL AND ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  56. (K JONES FOR S BATES)(COPY/ORIG FD-22-16) (SM)
  57. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE (COPY/ORIG FD-22-16) (SM)
  58. ORDER (COPY/ORIG FD-22-16)(SM)
  59. ORDER OF DISMISSAL (SM)
  60. EMERGENCY EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER, RTD 5-18-22
  61. DISMISSING COSTS
  62. ORDER AND DIRECTIVE (AO-23-3 DISPOSALE OF RECORDS PER
  63. OKLAHOMA STATUES, TITLE 20 § 1005)(JAD)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more