Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-06-23
Type Writ Habeas
Docket 100 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Ckt A Minor Child,
Photo of Hon. Childers Bridget M

Judge

Hon. Childers Bridget M

Cleveland County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION/APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
  2. LAW LIBRARY ASSESSMENT
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION ASSESSMENT
  4. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  5. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  6. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  7. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  9. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  11. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  12. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  13. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  14. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  15. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  16. AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
  17. ORDER OF RECUSAL
  18. (CERT COPY OF ORIG SUMMARY ORDER FROM CLEVELAND CO)
  19. S/O: PARTIES APPEAR IN PERSON W/ATTY KRISTEN JARMAN.
  20. CT. HEARS SWORN TESTIMONY. CT EXECUTES WRIT FOR THE
  21. CHILD TO BE BROUGHT BEFORE THIS COURT ON 6/27/22 @ 2:30
  22. PM. (BC)
  23. CERT COPY OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS & WRIT OF
  24. ASSISTANCE ISS'D IN CLEVELAND CO
  25. ORIG WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND WRIT OF ASSISTANCE
  26. RET'D- SERVED BOBBY RENNIE 6/24/22
  27. S/O: THE UNDERSIGNED HAS CONFIRMED W/CHIEF JUDG WALKLY
  28. AND NOT PARTIES OBJECT TO THE INDERSIGNED REASSIGN THIS
  29. MATTER TO JUDG CHILDERS FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. (JV)
  30. S/O: (DATED 6-27-22) MATTER COMES ON FOR APPL FOR
  31. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. WRIT IS GRANTED IMMEDIATLY;
  32. ROBERT RENNIE JR IS DIRECTED TO TRANSPORT M.C. FROM
  33. COURTHOUSE TO PARENTS HOME W/O DELAY. JURISDICTION IS
  34. PROPER FOR THIS ACTION IN DISTRICT COURT; ARGUMENT
  35. THAT ICWA APPLIES IS OVERRULED. COURT OFFERS THE
  36. FOLLOWING GUIDANCE: 1) M.C. SHOUD HAVE ACCESS TO CELL
  37. PHONE W/ PARENTAL CONTROLS APPROPRIATE. 2) M.C.
  38. SHOULD BE ABLE TO CONTACT HIS GRANDPARENTS AND HIS
  39. SISTER, BUT NO ADULTS SHOULD SPEAK TO HIM ABOUT LEGAL
  40. ISSUED, CUSTODY, ADOPTION ETC, AS THESE TOPICS ARE
  41. INAPPROPRIATE OUTSIDE THERAPEUTIC SETTING. 3) M.C.
  42. SHOULD HAVE A COUNSELOR W/WHERE HE CAN HAVE TRUST AND
  43. PARENTS WILL SEARCH IMMEDIATLY FOR A NEW COUNSELOR:
  44. SUGGESTIONS REBECCA WAKINE & DR MCCAFFREY; 4) COURT
  45. HOPES THE GRANDPARENTS & PARENTS WILL MAKE EFFORTS TO
  46. MEND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS BY ATTENDING A FAMILY
  47. COUNSELOR, BY AGREEMENT, AT 50% COST TO EACH. (BC)
  48. NOTICE OF FILING (HEARING DATED 6-2-22) (SANDRA J
  49. CHENOT, CSR)
  50. ORIG TRANSCRIPT (HEARING DATED 6-27-22) (SANDRA J
  51. CHENOT, CSR)
  52. APPLICATION FOR CONTEMPT CITATION
  53. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  54. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  55. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  56. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  57. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  58. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  59. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  60. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  61. CITATION FOR CONTEMPT (ATTY TO SERVE)
  62. CITATION FOR CONTEMPT RET'D- GREEN CARD RET'D- SIGNED
  63. BY ? FOR CHRISTOPHER TUCKER & MIKIALA TUCKER 7/20/22
  64. MOVANTS/PARENTS MOTION TO DIMISS APPLICATION FOR
  65. CITATION FOR CONTEMPT
  66. NOTICE OF HEARING
  67. S/O:(DATED 8/25/22) PARENTS APPEAR IN PERSON W/COUNSEL,
  68. SARAH MCFALL. GRANDPARENTS APPEAR IN PERSON THROUGH
  69. COUNSEL, ROBERT RENNIE. MATTERS COMES ON FOR PARENTS'
  70. MOTION TO DISMISS CONTEMPT CITATION & CONTEMPT
  71. ARRAIGNMENT. CT HEARS ARGUMENT FROM COUNSEL. PATENTS'
  72. MOTION TO DISMISS CONTEMPT CITATION DENIED. PARENTS
  73. AGGAIGNED. PLEA OF NOT GUILTY ENTERED, OR BOND(W/O OBJ)
  74. & PARENTS REQUEST A JURY TRIAL. MR RENNIE REQUESTS
  75. BRIEFING ON WHETHER THIS CASE SHALL BE TRIED IN
  76. CLEVELAND OR GARVIN COUNTY W/ THIS COURT PRESIDING. CT
  77. ORDERS BRIEFS RELATED TO WHETHER THIS CT SHALL CONDUCT
  78. ANY JURY TRIAL IN CLEVELAND OR GARVIN CO BE SUBMITTED
  79. ON OR BEFORE 9-15-22. MOTION TO SETTLE JE & STATUS
  80. CONFERENCE SET: OCT 24, 2022 @ 4:00PM (BC)
  81. NOTICE OF FILING
  82. (1 ORIG) TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS FROM 8/25/22 BEFORE
  83. JUDG BRIDGET M CHILDERS
  84. MOVANTS'/PARENTS' EMERGENCY MOTION TO RECONSIDER THEIR
  85. MOTION TO DISMISS APPL FOR CITATION FOR CONTEMPT &
  86. REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED HEARING TO BE HELD PRIOR TO VENUE
  87. BRIEF DEADLINE, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO CONTINUE THE
  88. 9-15-22 DEADLINE FOR VENUE BRIEFS
  89. RESPONSE TO MOVANT'S/PARENT'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO
  90. CONSIDER THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS APPLICATION FOR
  91. CITATION FOR CONTEMPT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more