Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Docket Entries
- ervice - Certified mail signature return card - Record signed for 7/24/2023
- otice-Incoming - Record completion notice from district court
- ees - Docket fee received
- otice-Outgoing - Docketing letter
- otice-Outgoing - E-filing requirement sent to M. Sullivan
- otion - Extension of time - brief
- vent - Hardcopy received - Appellants' Motion for Additional Time to File Opening Brief
- rder - Grant - extension of time
- rief - Appellant
- vent - Hardcopy received - Brief of Appellants; and received copy of designation of record on appeal
- otion - Extension of time - file brief
- vent - Hardcopy received - Appellee's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Brief
- rder Granting Appellee's Request for Extension to File Brief
- rief - Appellee
- otice-Outgoing - Request for transmitted record on appeal
- otice-Outgoing - Notice of case maturity
- vent - Hardcopy received - Appellee's Brief; and received copy of designation of record on appeal
- otice-Incoming - Record transmittal notice from district court
- ecord - Transmitted record on appeal from district court clerk, four volumes. Volumes 1 thru 3 - Original papers; Volume 4 - Transcripts (2)
- rief - Appellant reply
- vent - Hardcopy received - Reply Briefs of Appellants
- rder - Oral argument scheduled
- ral Argument Receipt Form (Complete and return to the SC Clerk's Office via email)
- otice-Incoming - Receipt acknowledgment - oral argument setting received by Gary Shockey obo appellants
- otion - Admission pro hac vice - Winslow R. Taylor, III
- otice-Incoming - Receipt acknowledgment - oral argument setting from Michael T. Sullivan and Winslow R. Taylor (arguing, pending pro hac vice admission)
- vent - Hardcopy received - Appellee's Motion to Admit Winslow R. Taylor, III as Attorney Pro Hac Vice
- Order Granting Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice (Winslow R. Taylor, III)
- Notice-Internal - Oral argument notice, argued before Chief Justice Fox, Justices Kautz, Boomgaarden, Gray and Fenn (Gary Shockey presenting argument obo Appellants and Michael T. Sullivan and Winslow R. Taylor appearing on behalf of the Appellee with argument presented by Mr. Taylor) and taken under advisement
- Opinion - Opinion and journal order, affirming with Justice Gray writing for the Court.
- Notice-Outgoing - Mandate
- Record - Record returned to district court
- Notice-Outgoing - Record return letter
- Event - Case closed
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In