Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Anderson Co

Court

Anderson Co

Tennessee

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-12-20
Status CL
Type Detainer Summons
Docket 36 entries
Disposition DEFAULT

Parties

Plaintiff Vanguard Investments Inc. ,
Defendant Reynolds , David R | Occupant(s) ,
Photo of Hon. DON A. LAYTON

Judge

Hon. DON A. LAYTON

Anderson County (TN)

Tennessee

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CIVIL WARRANT ISSUED
  2. FILING FEE PAID $236.50
  3. OUT TO BE SERVED ACSO
  4. CIVIL PROCESS RETURNED SERVED OCCUPANTS- DAVID REYNOLDS DECEASED
  5. DON A LAYTON, JUDGE
  6. JUDG'T FOR PLF AGAINST THE DEF DEFAULT AS TO OCCUPANTS RESEVER TO ESTATE JUDGE INFORMED TO GET A LETTER NOTARY SIGNED STATING OF REASON WHY TERESA SEIVERS WAS NOT AT COURT DATE 1/11/22 DUE TO HEALTH ISSUES MEDICAL STATUS ISSUES
  7. TD1 ORIGINAL TRIAL DATE
  8. MISCELLANEOUS COMMENT/NOTE A LETTER WAS DELIVERED REGARDING SIGNED BY NOTARY ABOUT MEDICAL STATUS REQUEST TO HAVE 30 DAYS OUT BEFORE NEW COURT DATE DUE TO MEDICAL ISSUES
  9. MISCELLANEOUS COMMENT/NOTE JUDGE RESET CASE FOR 2/15/21 AT 10AM: SEND OUT LETTERS TO OLIVER D. ADAMS & TERESA SEIVERS
  10. DON A LAYTON, JUDGE
  11. JUDG'T FOR PLF AGAINST THE DEF TERESA SEIVERS 2/15/22 WRIT OF POSSESSION AGAINST TERESA SEIVERS GRANTED MATTER RESET AT HER REQUEST - BY DEFAULT
  12. JUDG'T FOR PLF AGAINST THE DEF DEFAULT AS TO OCCUPANTS RESEVER TO ESTATE JUDGE INFORMED TO GET A LETTER NOTARY SIGNED STATING OF REASON WHY TERESA SEIVERS WAS NOT AT COURT DATE 1/11/22 DUE TO HEALTH ISSUES MEDICAL STATUS ISSUES
  13. TD1 ORIGINAL TRIAL DATE
  14. CIVIL PROCESS RETURNED READ AND LEFT A COPY WITH CLIFFORD BEAN
  15. MISCELLANEOUS COMMENT/NOTE A LETTER WAS DELIVERED REGARDING SIGNED BY NOTARY ABOUT MEDICAL STATUS REQUEST TO HAVE 30 DAYS OUT BEFORE NEW COURT DATE DUE TO MEDICAL ISSUES
  16. MISCELLANEOUS COMMENT/NOTE JUDGE RESET CASE FOR 2/15/21 AT 10AM: SEND OUT LETTERS TO OLIVER D. ADAMS & TERESA SEIVERS
  17. CIVIL PROCESS RETURNED
  18. TD1 ORIGINAL TRIAL DATE
  19. DON A LAYTON, JUDGE
  20. JUDG'T FOR PLF AGAINST THE DEF TERESA SEIVERS 2/15/22 WRIT OF POSSESSION AGAINST TERESA SEIVERS GRANTED MATTER RESET AT HER REQUEST - BY DEFAULT
  21. RET RESET
  22. TD1 ORIGINAL TRIAL DATE
  23. MISCELLANEOUS COMMENT/NOTE RESET LETTER FOR COURT DATE 5/3/22 CALLED ATTY OFFICE CHANGED COURT DATE TO 7/26/22
  24. CLERK NOTE: TALKED TO MENDELSON LAW FIRM CHANGED THE COURT DATE TO 7/26/22 AT 10:00 DUE TO JUDGE NOT HERE ON 5/3/22
  25. MISCELLANEOUS COMMENT/NOTE COURT DATE 7/26/22
  26. STU STATUS
  27. JUDG'T FOR PLF AGAINST THE DEF $6000.00 + 0% INTEREST BY AGREEMENT
  28. RET RESET
  29. CERTIFIED COPY
  30. DON A LAYTON, JUDGE
  31. JUDG'T FOR PLF AGAINST THE DEF $14,848.54 + COURT COST BY AGREEMENT.
  32. STU STATUS
  33. CERTIFIED COPY
  34. SENT COPY OF JMT BACK TO ATTY
  35. SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT
  36. SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more