Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Muskingum Co

Court

Muskingum Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-07-21
Status Open
Type Cr -Criminal
Docket 14 entries
Disposition DISPOSED

Parties

Defendant Barr, Richard L
Photo of Hon. FLEEGLE MARK C

Judge

Hon. FLEEGLE MARK C

Muskingum Co

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. INDICTMENT AND REQUEST FOR WARRANT FILED. WARRANT WITH CERTIFIED COPY OF WARRANT AND INDICTMENT ISSUED TO SHERIFF OF MUSKINGUM COUNTY.
  2. ENTRY ORDERING BOND FILED. AMOUNT OF BOND $75,000.00, CPS.
  3. WARRANT TO ARREST RETURNED AND FILED. I RECEIVED THIS WARRANT ON 7/21/2022, AND PURSUANT TO ITS COMMAND, ON 7/29/2022, I ARRESTED 7/29/2022, GAVE THEM A COPY OF THIS WARRANT WITH A COPY OF THE INDICTMENT ATTACHED AND NOW HAVE HIS/HER BODY BEFORE THE COURT. BY: DEP BUNTING
  4. DEMAND FOR DISCOVERY, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED. Attorney: EDWARDS, KEITH A
  5. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE / AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY FILED.
  6. ENTRY FILED. PLEA OF NOT GUILTY. BOND CONTINUED.
  7. STENO FEES
  8. INDIGENT DEFENSE SUPPORT FUND/BOND HOLDING FEE. Receipt: 207548 Date: 08/04/2022
  9. RECOGNIZANCE OF ACCUSED (APPEARANCE BOND) FILED. SURETY: CHARLES MILLER BONDING
  10. JOURNAL ENTRY ASSIGNING TRIAL DATE, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED. TRIAL FOR THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS SCHEDULED FOR: THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 JUDGE FLEEGLE PRESIDING. THERE WILL BE A HEARING ON THE PROSECUTOR'S DESIGNATION OF NONDISCLOSURE OF EVIDENCE OR FOR COUNSEL ONLY ON: SHOULD SAID HEARING BE REQUESTED BY COUNSEL FOR DEFENSE.
  11. JOURNAL ENTRY, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED. PRETRIAL MOTIONS IN ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER MAY BE FILED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS PRIOR TO 1ST DAY OF TRIAL. DEFTS COUNSEL SHALL OBTAIN HEARING DATE FROM COURT'S BAILIFF PRIOR TO FILING SUCH MOTIONS. NO MOTION MAY BE FILED OR CONSIDERED MORNING OF TRIAL OR PRIOR TO SELECTION OF JURY.
  12. ENTRY FILED. THE COURT APPOINTS KEITH EDWARDS AS COUNSEL.
  13. PLEA OF GUILTY FILED.
  14. ENTRY FILED. PLEA ACCEPTED BY THE COURT. SENTENCE WAS DEFERRED AND A PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION WAS ORDERED CONDUCTED BY THE ADULT PROBATION DEPT. BOND WAS CONTINUED.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more