Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- FILE & ENTER PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
- LAW LIBRARY
- DISPUTE MEDIATION
- MAILING
- OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
- 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
- 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
- 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
- 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
- COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
- EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER (ISSUED) TO MCSO
- ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE
- ORDER
- EMERGENCY ORDER OF PROTECTION (RET'D) BY MCSO SERVING:
- GARRET ALEXANDER
- COURT ORDER: THIS MATTER COMES ON FOR FINAL TRIAL ON
- MERITS. PETITION DOES NOT APPEAR. DEFENDANT APPEARS
- IN PERSON. THIS MATTER IS CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 8,
- 2022 AT 11:00 A.M. TRACKING CF-22-81. FURTHERMORE,
- THE COURT ORDERS THAT THE TEMPORARY ORDER SHALL REMAIN
- IN FULL FORCE AS PREVIOUSLY ORDERED BY THE COURT.
- SUBPOENA (ISS'D) TO MCSO SERVING: JASON CONYER, DEREK
- ROLIN, SAMUEL ROLIN
- ORDER TO APPEAR/NOTICE OF HEARING
- COURT ORDER: THIS MATTER COMES ON FOR FINAL TRIAL ON
- THE MERITS. PLAINTIFF APPEARS IN PERSON, PRO-SE.
- DEFENDANT APPEARS IN PERSON AND WITH HIS ATTORNEY,
- RUSSELL WASHINGTON. THE COURT FINDS THAT THE PETITION
- WAS FILED HEREIN ON AUGUST 12, 2022, AND THE PARTIES DO
- NOT MEET THE RELATIONSHIP REQUIREMENT UNDER OKLAHOMA
- LAW. FURTHERMORE, THE PLAINTIFF DID NOT ALLEGE
- STALKING. THEREFORE, THE COURT ORDERS THAT THE
- PETITION FOR PROTECITVE ORDER BE OVERRULED AND THAT
- THIS MATTER BE DISMISSED. PLAINTIFF IS ADVISED THAT HE
- CAN RE-FILE HIS PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER UNDER THE
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In