Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Stamford County

Court

Stamford County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-12-01
Type M 50 Misc Declaratory Judgment
Docket 57 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Local 786, International Association Of Fire Fighters|Paul Anderson
Defendant Firefighters Pension Trust Fund Board Of Trustees|City Of Stamford|Trevor Roach|Miguel Robles

Docket Entries

  1. OTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE – PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD – 13-6/13-9) re: City of Stamford
  2. PPEARANCE Appearance
  3. UMMONS
  4. OMPLAINT
  5. ETURN OF SERVICE
  6. MENDED WRIT AND SUMMONS
  7. OTION TO DISMISS PB 10-30 DEFENDANTS CITY OF STAMFORD AND FIREFIGHTERS? PENSION TRUST FUND BOARD OF TRUSTEES? MOT. TO DISMISS RESULT: Order 4/6/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  8. RDER RESULT: Order 10/6/2022 BY THE CLERK
  9. RDER RESULT: Order 4/6/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  10. EMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
  11. OTION TO DISMISS PB 10-30 Trevor Roach and Miguel Robles' Motion to Dismiss RESULT: Order 4/6/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  12. RDER RESULT: Order 10/14/2022 BY THE CLERK
  13. RDER RESULT: Order 4/6/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  14. EMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION Trevor Roach and Miguel Robles' Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss
  15. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
  16. EMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS PB 10-31
  17. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RESULT: Granted 4/27/2022 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  18. RDER RESULT: Granted 4/27/2022 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  19. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to Plaintiffs' Objection to Motion to Dismiss RESULT: Granted 4/27/2022 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  20. ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/27/2022 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  21. REPLY Reply in Further Support of Motion to Dismiss
  22. REPLY Defendant Roach and Robles' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
  23. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Order 11/3/2022 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  24. ORDER RESULT: Order 11/3/2022 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  25. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 12/2/2022 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  26. ORDER RESULT: Granted 12/2/2022 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  27. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116)
  28. MOTION TO REARGUE/RECONSIDER RESULT: Denied 5/8/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  29. ORDER RESULT: Denied 5/8/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  30. MEMORANDUM Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs Practice Book 11-11 Motion
  31. JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL RESULT: HON WILLIAM CLARK
  32. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME DEF. CITY OF STAMFORD'S CONSENT MOTION FOR EXT. OF TIME TO FILE A REQUEST TO REVISE COMPLAINT RESULT: Granted 5/8/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  33. ORDER RESULT: Granted 5/8/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  34. NOTICE OF INTENTION TO APPEAL
  35. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Defendant?s Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File a Request to Revise Complaint RESULT: Granted 6/20/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  36. ORDER RESULT: Granted 6/20/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  37. REQUEST TO REVISE City of Stamford's Request to Revise Complaint
  38. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RESULT: Granted 7/31/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  39. ORDER RESULT: Granted 7/31/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  40. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RESULT: Granted 8/21/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  41. ORDER RESULT: Granted 8/21/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  42. OBJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE RESULT: Sustained 2/26/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  43. ORDER RESULT: Sustained 2/26/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  44. REPLACE RECORD TO PLEADING STATUS (KEYPOINT 2) AND ERASE ALL HIGHER KEYPOINT DATES
  45. SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Order 12/19/2023 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  46. ORDER RESULT: Order 12/19/2023 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  47. RDER RESULT: Order 12/28/2023 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  48. EVISED COMPLAINT
  49. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE
  50. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE The City of Stamford's Answer to Plaintiff Paul Anderson?s Revised Complaint dated March 21, 2024
  51. OTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE – PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD – 13-6/13-9)
  52. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
  53. RDER RESULT: Order 6/24/2024 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  54. RDER RESULT: Order 6/25/2024 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  55. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff?s Interrogatories and Requests for Production
  56. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
  57. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more