Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Millford County

Court

Millford County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-10-04
Type W 00 Wills Probate Appeals
Docket 37 entries
Disposition judgment of dismissal

Parties

Plaintiff Marc Pennino
Defendant Paul Pennino|Phyllis Ruth Pennino|Removed|Susan Pennino, Executor Of The Estate Of Phyllis Pennino
Photo of Hon. Hon Barbara Bellis

Judge

Hon. Hon Barbara Bellis

Connecticut

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL RESULT: HON BARBARA BELLIS
  2. APPEARANCE Appearance
  3. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSION PB 13-22
  6. MOTION TO DISMISS PB 10-30 RESULT: Denied 3/20/2023 HON PETER BROWN
  7. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RESULT: Denied 3/20/2023 HON PETER BROWN
  8. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PB 13-5
  9. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PB 13-5 Amended Motion for Protective Order (in lieu of 104.00)
  10. OBJECTION TO MOTION Appellant's Objection to Motions 104.00 and 105.00
  11. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS PB 10-31
  12. REPLY Reply re: Motion for Protective Order
  13. REPLY re: Motion to Dismiss 103.00
  14. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) re: motions marked for 1/30/23 short calendar RESULT: Granted 2/2/2023 HON PETER BROWN
  15. ORDER RESULT: Granted 2/2/2023 HON PETER BROWN
  16. EXHIBITS Appellant's Supplemental Exhibits in connection with 106.00 and 107.00
  17. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE of Status Conference re: Scheduling Order RESULT: Granted 3/24/2023 HON MATTHEW FRECHETTE
  18. ORDER RESULT: Granted 3/24/2023 HON MATTHEW FRECHETTE
  19. ORDER RESULT: Order 3/27/2023 HON PETER BROWN
  20. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 4/10/2023 HON PETER BROWN
  21. ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/10/2023 HON PETER BROWN
  22. ORDER RESULT: Order 4/12/2023 HON PETER BROWN
  23. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 5/12/2023 HON PETER BROWN
  24. ORDER RESULT: Granted 5/12/2023 HON PETER BROWN
  25. MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTY RESULT: Granted 8/18/2023 HON JASON WELCH
  26. ORDER RESULT: Granted 8/18/2023 HON JASON WELCH
  27. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond or Object to Appellees' Motion 117.00 RESULT: Order 8/14/2023 HON JASON WELCH
  28. ORDER RESULT: Order 8/14/2023 HON JASON WELCH
  29. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
  30. MOTION FOR ORDER See, 117.00, 118.00, and 118.10 RESULT: Denied 9/5/2023 HON JASON WELCH
  31. ORDER RESULT: Denied 9/5/2023 HON JASON WELCH
  32. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Defendant's Objection to Second Motion for Extension of Time
  33. SUGGESTION OF DEATH
  34. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Objection to Third Motion for Extension of Time
  35. MOTION TO DISMISS PB 10-30 RESULT: Order 8/30/2024 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  36. ORDER RESULT: Order 8/30/2024 HON BARBARA BELLIS
  37. ORDER RESULT: Granted 9/30/2024 HON BARBARA BELLIS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more