Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of New Britain County

Court

New Britain County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-06-17
Type W 00 Wills Probate Appeals
Docket 41 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Denise Guglielmo
Defendant Dennis Picarelli Executor Of The Estate Of Elizabeth Picarelli|Debbie Picarelli|Dennis Picarelli C/o Vitrano, Preleski, & Wynne, Llc|Diane Picarelli Damiano|Daniel Picarelli|Probate Court Region #19|Non Appearing|Commissioner Of The Department Of Administrative Services

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  2. APPEARANCE Appearance
  3. SUMMONS
  4. COMPLAINT
  5. CONTINUATION OF PARTIES
  6. RETURN OF SERVICE
  7. REQUEST TO REVISE
  8. OBJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE RESULT: Overruled 9/26/2022 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  9. ORDER RESULT: Overruled 9/26/2022 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  10. MOTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD for Failure to File a Revised Complaint RESULT: Denied 11/15/2022 BY THE CLERK
  11. ORDER RESULT: Denied 11/15/2022 BY THE CLERK
  12. REVISED COMPLAINT
  13. MOTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Denied 3/17/2023 BY THE CLERK
  14. ORDER RESULT: Denied 3/17/2023 BY THE CLERK
  15. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE dated March 20, 2023
  16. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PB 13-5 RESULT: Denied 9/25/2023 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  17. ORDER RESULT: Denied 9/25/2023 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  18. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Rejected 7/3/2023 BY THE CLERK
  19. ORDER RESULT: Rejected 7/3/2023 BY THE CLERK
  20. REQUEST FOR ARGUMENT - NON-ARG MATTER (JD-CV-128)
  21. OBJECTION to Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order RESULT: Sustained 9/25/2023 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  22. ORDER RESULT: Off 7/26/2023 HON JOSEPH SHORTALL
  23. ORDER RESULT: Sustained 9/25/2023 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  24. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Order 8/24/2023 HON LISA MORGAN
  25. ORDER RESULT: Order 8/24/2023 HON LISA MORGAN
  26. REPLY MEMORANDUM
  27. ORDER RESULT: Order 9/25/2023 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  28. REVISED COMPLAINT
  29. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 4/24/2024 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  30. ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/24/2024 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  31. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE of Remote Status Conference RESULT: Granted 5/6/2024 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  32. ORDER RESULT: Granted 5/6/2024 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  33. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE of Remote Status Conference Scheduled for October 9, 2024 RESULT: Granted 10/1/2024 HON JASON WELCH
  34. ORDER RESULT: Granted 10/1/2024 HON JASON WELCH
  35. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 12/3/2024 HON ERIC SMITH
  36. ORDER RESULT: Granted 12/3/2024 HON ERIC SMITH
  37. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF REMOTE PRETRIAL BECAUSE THERE IS NEW COUNSEL REPRESENTING PLAINTIFF RESULT: Granted 7/16/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  38. ORDER RESULT: Granted 7/16/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  39. ORDER CCP due RESULT: Order 9/16/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  40. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE Answer and Special Defenses to Revised Complaint
  41. REPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more