Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Stamford County

Court

Stamford County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-10
Type T 30 Torts Malpractice All Other
Docket 24 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Star Partners, Llc
Defendant Awa Design Group, P.c. Removed|Redniss And Mead, Inc.

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. RDER RESULT: Order 8/1/2024 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  2. OMPLAINT
  3. PPEARANCE Appearance
  4. PPEARANCE Appearance
  5. ETURN OF SERVICE
  6. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 9/19/2022 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  7. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/19/2022 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  8. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 9/19/2022 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  9. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/19/2022 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  10. REQUEST TO REVISE
  11. WITHDRAWAL OF ACTION AGAINST PARTICULAR DEFENDANT(S) – CASE REMAINS PENDING
  12. ORDER RESULT: Order 5/16/2023 HON WILLIAM CLARK
  13. SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Order 10/5/2023 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  14. ORDER Last Updated: Entry Number - 10/13/2023
  15. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/5/2023 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  16. MOTION FOR NONSUIT FOR FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Off 11/27/2023 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  17. ORDER RESULT: Off 11/27/2023 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  18. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/16/2023 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  19. REVISED COMPLAINT
  20. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR NONSUIT RESULT: Off 11/27/2023 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  21. ORDER RESULT: Off 11/27/2023 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  22. EQUEST TO REVISE Re: 109.00
  23. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
  24. RDER RESULT: Order 7/31/2024 HON SHEILA OZALIS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more