Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of New Britain County

Court

New Britain County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-09-30
Type T 12 Torts Defective Premises Public Other
Docket 42 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Arleen Beger
Defendant City Of Bristol, C/o Town Clerk Of Bristol|Raymond Rogozinski C/o City Of Bristol|Craig Kasparian C/o City Of Bristol
Photo of Hon. Robert Young

Judge

Hon. Robert Young

Connecticut

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. APPEAL TO APPELLATE COURT
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. REQUEST TO REVISE
  6. NOTICE Defendants' Notice of Service of PB Forms 203 & 206, Directed to Plaintiff
  7. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  8. OBJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE RESULT: Sustained 1/17/2023 HON KIMBERLY KNOX
  9. ORDER RESULT: Sustained 1/17/2023 HON KIMBERLY KNOX
  10. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE
  11. SCHEDULING ORDER Watermark
  12. WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION Withdrawal of Scheduling Order
  13. SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Order 2/1/2023 HON LISA MORGAN
  14. ORDER RESULT: Order 2/1/2023 HON LISA MORGAN
  15. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Request for Interrogatories
  16. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to IRPs RESULT: Granted 3/27/2023 HON LISA MORGAN
  17. ORDER RESULT: Granted 3/27/2023 HON LISA MORGAN
  18. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE Defendants' Notice of Compliance w/Plaintiff's IRPs dated January 11, 2023
  19. MOTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE – PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD – 13-6/13-9) RESULT: Off 6/13/2023 HON WALTER MENJIVAR
  20. ORDER RESULT: Off 6/13/2023 HON WALTER MENJIVAR
  21. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER Motion to Modify Scheduling Order Deadlines and Trial Date RESULT: Denied 5/22/2023 HON LISA MORGAN
  22. ORDER RESULT: Denied 5/22/2023 HON LISA MORGAN
  23. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER Motion to Modify Scheduling Order Deadlines and Trial Date RESULT: Granted 8/8/2023 HON WALTER MENJIVAR
  24. ORDER RESULT: Granted 8/8/2023 HON WALTER MENJIVAR
  25. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Motion for Summary Judgment w Memo of Law and Exhibits RESULT: Order 10/6/2023 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  26. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/6/2023 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  27. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  28. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Motion for Extension of Time Within Which to Respond to Summary Judgment RESULT: Granted 7/25/2023 HON WALTER MENJIVAR
  29. ORDER RESULT: Granted 7/25/2023 HON WALTER MENJIVAR
  30. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER Plaintiff's Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order Deadlines and Continuance of Court Dates RESULT: Granted 8/28/2023 HON WALTER MENJIVAR
  31. ORDER RESULT: Granted 8/28/2023 HON WALTER MENJIVAR
  32. MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  33. REPLY Reply to Plaintiff's Objection to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment
  34. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Denied 9/21/2023 HON LISA MORGAN
  35. ORDER RESULT: Denied 9/21/2023 HON LISA MORGAN
  36. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Order 11/1/2023 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  37. ORDER RESULT: Order 11/1/2023 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  38. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 11/14/2023 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  39. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 11/14/2023 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  40. ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/14/2023 HON ROBERT YOUNG
  41. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
  42. SUMMARY JUDGMENT-DEFENDANT RESULT: HON ROBERT YOUNG

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more