Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Litchfield County

Court

Litchfield County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-08
Type A 66 Appeals Inland Wetlands & Conservation Commission Local
Docket 36 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Northwest Connecticut Land Conservancy, Inc.
Defendant Town Of New Milford Inland Wetlands And Watercourses Commission|Artel Engineering Group, Llc|Removed|Arthur Klebanoff|Susan Hirschhorn|Commissioner Of Department Of Energy And Environmental Protection|Non Appearing

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. APPEARANCE Appearance
  2. APPEARANCE Appearance
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
  5. RETURN OF SERVICE
  6. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 10/18/2022 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  7. ORDER RESULT: Granted 10/18/2022 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  8. CERTIFIED LIST OF PAPERS IN THE RECORD PB 14-7A(b)/14-7B(b)
  9. MOTION TO STRIKE
  10. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION Motion to Strike
  11. WITHDRAWAL OF ACTION AGAINST PARTICULAR DEFENDANT(S) – CASE REMAINS PENDING Withdrawal re: Defendant Artel Engineering Group LLC
  12. ORDER RESULT: Order 11/29/2022 HON JOHN PICKARD
  13. RETURN OF RECORD
  14. EXHIBITS To Return of Record(107.00) Exhibits A-Z1(Submitted Prior to Decision by Inland Wetlands Commission)
  15. EXHIBITS To Return of Record107.00-Exhibits AA-ZZ(Submitted Prior to Decision by Inland Wetlands Commission)
  16. EXHIBITS To Return of Record (107.00) Exhibits AAA-OOO (After Resolution of Approval)
  17. BRIEF Plaintiff NCLC Brief
  18. BRIEF Brief of Defendants Arthur Klebanoff and Susan Hirschhorn
  19. ANSWER of Defendant, Town of New Milford Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission
  20. BRIEF of New Milford Inland Wetlands And Watercourses Commission
  21. NOTICE Of Correction And Substitute Filing
  22. ANSWER Answer of Defendants Klebanoff and Hirschhorn
  23. BRIEF Plaintiff NCLC Reply Brief
  24. LIST OF EXHIBITS (JD-CL-28/JD-CL-28a)
  25. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Consent Motion ro Delay for Thirty Days Issuance of Decision
  26. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Consent Motion ro Delay for Thirty Days Issuance of Decision (Roraback, J.) RESULT: Granted 8/18/2023 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  27. ORDER RESULT: Granted 8/18/2023 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  28. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Consent Motion ro Delay for Thirty Days Issuance of Decision (Roraback, J.) RESULT: Granted 9/15/2023 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  29. ORDER RESULT: Granted 9/15/2023 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  30. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Caseflow Request re Second Consent Motion RESULT: Granted 9/15/2023 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  31. ORDER RESULT: Granted 9/15/2023 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  32. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Stipulation by Consernt of All Parties for Extension of Time to Issue Decision 3 RESULT: Granted 10/18/2023 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  33. ORDER RESULT: Granted 10/18/2023 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  34. MOTION TO WITHDRAW LAND USE APPEAL RESULT: Granted 11/16/2023 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  35. ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/16/2023 HON ANDREW RORABACK
  36. WITHDRAWAL OF ACTION Per Order of Court (8-8n) 11/16/2023

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more