Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Solano County

Court

Solano County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-01-24
Status Finaldisp - Final Disposition
Type Ap - Appeal
Docket 44 entries

Parties

Defendant District, Attorney
Photo of Hon. Williams Janice M

Judge

Hon. Williams Janice M

Solano County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. APPEAL OF 1538.5 MOTION
  2. FILED; CR-132 NOTICE OF APPEAL REGARDING DENIED 1538 MOTION // MDOM
  3. NOTICE (NO FEE)
  4. FILED; CR-134 NOTICE REGARDING RECORD ON APPEAL // MDOM
  5. NOTICE OF APPEAL
  6. NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF APPELA; COPIES PROVIDED TO SOLANO DA AND SOLANO PD // MDOM
  7. PROPOSED ORDER
  8. ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT // MDOM
  9. SUBMITTED
  10. NOTEN, CR-132, CR-134, AND ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT SUBMITTED TO D11 FOR REVIEW // MDOM
  11. REQUEST
  12. ELECTRONIC RECORDING REQUEST FOR 1/7/2022 D6; SENT VIA EMAIL TO D6 K. SCHAAF, J. KYLE, K. FIERRO AND R. RODRIGUEZ //MDOM C.D. COMPLETED AND DELIVERING TO APPELLATE CLERK. K. SCHAAF.
  13. NOTICE/REMINDER/CRT RPTR/APPL
  14. NOTIFIED COURT REPORTER K. WELLS VIA EMAIL; TRANSCRIPTS DUE 2/22/2022 (TRANSCRIPT ASSIGNED TO M. WILSON) // MDOM
  15. ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT
  16. FILED; ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT SIGNED BY JUDGE PENDERGAST ON 1/17/2022; COURTESY COPY PROVIDED TO SOLANO DA AND SOLANO PD (CAM ATTACHED DATED 1/31/2022) // MDOM
  17. CERTIFICATE
  18. CLERK'S CERTIFICATEOF RECORD ON APPEAL PREPARED FROM TRIAL CASE FCR344194 W/ UNDERLYING COURT DOCUMENTS // MDOM
  19. NOTICE (NO FEE)
  20. BRIEFING SCHEDULE W/COURT DATE OF 6/16/2022 AT 3:30PM IN D11. (TRIAL CASE FCR344194) COPIES TO DA AND PD, INCLUDING COPIES OF CLERK'S TRANSCRIPTS ON FILE // MDOM
  21. COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT-ONLI
  22. DOWNLOADED, 01/07/22 REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT 1538.5 MOTION (TRIAL CASE FCR344194), HEARD BEFORE JUDGE DANIELS, TRANSCRIBED BY M. WILSON // MDOM
  23. SETTLMT/STATMNT/TRANSCR.APPEAL
  24. REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT VOLUME 1 SENT VIA INTEROFFICE TO SOLANO DA AND SOLANO PD // MDOM
  25. BRIEF
  26. FILED; APELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF. ENDORSED PROVIDED TO PD, REMAINING COPIES TO D11 // MDOM
  27. APPLICATION (NO FEE)
  28. RECEIVED FROM DA; PEOPLE'S APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONDANT'S REPLY BRIEF. SUBMITTED TO D1 FOR REVIEW // MDOM
  29. ORDER
  30. FILED; ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON CAL 7/21/2022 AT 3:30PM IN D1. NEW BRIEFING SCHEDULE TO GO OUT. COPY TO DA AND PD // MDOM
  31. VACATED
  32. ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONDENT'S BRIEF // MDOM
  33. NOTICE (NO FEE)
  34. 1ST AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPEAL AND BRIEFING REQUIREMENTS // MDOM
  35. BRIEF
  36. FILED; RESPONDENT'S OPENING BRIEF. ENDORSED COPIES PROVIDED TO SOLANO DA AND PD, REMAINING COPIES TO D1 // LLEW
  37. VACATED
  38. MOVED TO D1 // MDOM
  39. UNDER SUBMISSION
  40. Order Prepared 15-Aug-2022.
  41. HEARD
  42. MATTER SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS, SUBMITTED TO JUDGE WILLIAMS FOR DECISION
  43. APPEAL WITH OPINION
  44. FILED; DECISION ON APPEAL - AFFIRMED (TRIAL CASE FCR344194) // MDOM SIGNED BY JUDGE KAUFFMAN ON 8/17/2022 SIGNED BY JUDGE CARRINGER ON 8/16/2022 SIGNED BY JUDGE WILLIAMS ON 8/15/2022 CERTIFIED COPIES PROVIDED TO SOLANO DA AND SOLANO PD ON 8/19/2022

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more