Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Texas Supreme Court

Court

Texas Supreme Court

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-09
Type Multidistrict Litigation
Docket 7 entries

Docket Entries

  1. ultidistrcit Litigation Motion to Transfer. Defendants Motion for Transfer to a Multidistrict Litigation Pretrial Court and Request for Stay of all Trial Court Proceedings filed on behalf of Kevin Daniel Cichoracki and Maxim Crane Works, L.P. by attorney Kent Adams
  2. ultidistrict Litigation Motion. Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of Their Amended Motion to Transfer to a Multidistrict Litigation Pretrial Court and Request for Stay of All Trial Court Proceedings filed on behalf of Kevin Daniel Cichoracki, et al. by attorney Dani Sanders
  3. ultidistrict Litigation Motion to Transfer disposed. Order issued stating: "After due consideration of the motion to transfer, the response, and the applicable law, we deny the motion to transfer. We conclude that the movants failed to demonstrate that a transfer to an MDL pretrial court would serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the actions. Id. The motion to transfer and the motion for stay are denied. (9/29/2022 3:05:28 PM) 22-0663 MDL Order Denying Transfer 09-29-22.pdf
  4. DL Motion to Stay disposed. Request for Stay of All Trial Court Proceedings denied
  5. DL Response to Motion for Transfer. Plaintiffs' Combined Response to Defendants' First Amended Motion for Transfer to MDL Pretrial Court and Request for Stay of all Trial Court Proceedings filed on behalf of David Alas, Joel Chavez, Wilmer Fajardo, Noe Lopez and Leonel Ramirez by attorney Daniel Johnson
  6. mendment to Multidistrict Litigation filing. Defendants' First Amended Motion for Transfer to MDL Pretrial Court and Request for Stay of All Trial Court Proceedings filed by Kevin Daniel Cichoracki and Maxim Crane Works, L.P. by attorney Kent Adams
  7. otion to Stay filed before the MDL Panel. Request for Stay of All Trial Court Proceedings (incorporated within the Motion to Transfer) filed on behalf of DefendantsKevin Daniel Cichoracki and Maxim Crane Works, L.P. filed by attorney Kent Adams

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more