Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Johnson County District Court

Court

Johnson County District Court

Kansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-07-25
Status TERMINATED
Type Dissolution/divorce Action
Docket 45 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Kalra, Amandeep Md|Wise, Jean W|Mcclaflin, Katie A
Defendant Rai, Dipinpreet K Md
Photo of Hon. Paul W Burmaster

Judge

Hon. Paul W Burmaster

Johnson County (KS)

Kansas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. CANCELLED REVW on 03/27/23,10:30am,Div14 DUE TO CASE TERMINATION
  2. Changed Case Status: From: PENDING To: TERMINATED (DISMISSED)
  3. FILE STAMP 02/03/23, STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
  4. <******* Bench Notes *********> PARTIES APPEAR WITH COUNSELS, J. WISE AND K. MCCLAFLIN BY ZOOM. PETITIONER'S COUNSEL REPORTS MOST DISCOVERY DONE. COUNSEL REPORTS PARENTING TIME ISSUES. MAY NEED GAL. RESPONDENT'S COUNSEL BELIEVES JUST A FEW DISCOVERY ISSUES REMAIN. PARTIES MAY REQUEST GAL AND COURT WILL ORDER. DICOVERY TO BE DELIVERED BY 2/15/23. CONTINUE FOR REVIEW AND SCHEDULING TO 3/27/23 AT 10:30 BY ZOOM.(RPTR: RECORDING)(JUDGE: BURMASTER)
  5. SCHED. REVIEW HEARING on 03/27/23,10:30am,Div 14
  6. FILE STAMP 01/21/23, NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PETITIONER'S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
  7. FILE STAMP 01/11/23, NOTICE OF HEARING
  8. CANCELLED MOTION TO COMPEL on 02/08/23,10:30am,Div 14, MOTION BEING SET WITH THE 1/24/23 HEARING.
  9. FILE STAMP 12/12/22, NOTICE OF HEARING
  10. SCHED. MOTION TO COMPEL on 02/08/23,10:30am,Div 14
  11. FILE STAMP 12/02/22, RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING DISCOVERY
  12. FILE STAMP 11/22/22, AGREED ORDER REGARDING PARENTING TIME
  13. <******* Bench Notes *********> PETITIONER APPEARS WITH COUNSEL, J. WISE BY ZOOM. RESPONDENT MOTHER APPEARS WITH COUNSEL, K. MCCLAFLIN BY ZOOM. PETITIONER REPORTS THINGS PROGRESSING INCLUDING DISCOVERY. HOLIDAY PLAN IS SET. RESPONDENT'S COUNSEL GENERALLY AGREES BUT BELIEVES HOLIDAYS NOT QUITE DONE. CONTINUE FOR REVIEW TO 1/24/23 AT 2:00 BY ZOOM.(RPTR: RECORDING)(JUDGE: BURMASTER)
  14. SCHED. REVIEW HEARING on 01/24/23,02:00pm,Div 14
  15. FILE STAMP 11/15/22, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF RESPONDENT'S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
  16. FILE STAMP 11/02/22, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF RESPONDENT'S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
  17. FILE STAMP 10/14/22, STIPULATED AMENDED TEMPORARY ORDERS
  18. FILE STAMP 10/07/22, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
  19. FILE STAMP 10/04/22, DOMESTIC RELATIONS AFFIDAVIT OF RESPONDENT
  20. FILE STAMP 10/04/22, CHILD SUPPORT WORKSHEET(SUBMITTED BY DIPINREET)
  21. SCHED. REVIEW HEARING on 11/16/22,09:00am,Div 14
  22. <******* Bench Notes *********> PETITIONER APPEARS WITH COUNSEL, J. WISE BY ZOOM. RESPONDENT APPEARS BY COUNSEL, K. MCCLAFLIN BY ZOOM. PARTIES REACHED AGREEMENT ON REVISED TEMP ORDERS. CONTINUE FOR REVIEW TO 11/16/22 AT 9:00 BY ZOOM.(RPTR: RECORDING)(JUDGE: BURMASTER)
  23. FILE STAMP 10/03/22, CHILD SUPPORT WORKSHEET
  24. FILE STAMP 10/03/22, AMENDED DOMESTIC RELATIONS AFFIDAVIT OF PETITIONER
  25. FILE STAMP 09/30/22, DOMESTIC RELATIONS AFFIDAVIT OF PETITIONER
  26. FILE STAMP 09/13/22, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF RESPONDENT'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO PETITIONER
  27. AMANDEEP KALRA COMPLETED PARENTS FOREVER
  28. FILE STAMP 09/08/22, NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PETITIONER'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
  29. FILE STAMP 09/01/22, NOTICE OF HEARING
  30. SCHED. MOTION TO MODIFY on 10/04/22,10:30am,Div 14
  31. FILE STAMP 08/16/22, RESPONDENT'S PROPOSED TEMPORARY PARENTING PLAN
  32. FILE STAMP 08/16/22, MOTION TO MODIFY EX PARTE TEMPORARY ORDERS AND PARENTING PLAN
  33. FILE STAMP 08/16/22, ANSWER TO AMENDED PETITION FOR DIVORCE AND COUNTER-PETITION FOR DIVORCE
  34. ELECTRONIC ENTRY OF APPEARANCE BY KATIE A MCCLAFLIN AS A DEFENSE ATTORNEY FOR DIPINPREET K RAI, MD
  35. DIPINPREET K RAI COMPLETED PARENTS FOREVER
  36. FILE STAMP 08/01/22, RETURN OF SERVICE
  37. PETITION, SUMMONS AND ORDER ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR PROCESS SERVER "DIPINPREET K RAI, MD" E/S
  38. FILE STAMP 07/26/2022, ORDER FOR PARENTS FOREVER
  39. FILE STAMP 07/26/22 10:41am, REQUEST AND SERVICE INSTRUCTION FORM
  40. FILE STAMP 07/26/22, EX PARTE TEMPORARY ORDERS AND PARENTING PLAN
  41. FILE STAMP 07/26/22, ORDER FOR PARENTS FOREVER
  42. FILE STAMP 07/26/22, AMENDED PETITION FOR DIVORCE
  43. Judge PAUL W BURMASTER assigned to case ASSOC CASE
  44. FILE STAMP 07/25/22, PETITION FOR DIVORCE
  45. JUDGE KEVEN O'GRADY ASSIGNED TO CASE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more