Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Johnson County District Court

Court

Johnson County District Court

Kansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-07-26
Status Closed
Type Cv Habeas Corpus
Docket 20 entries
Disposition order of dismissal

Parties

Plaintiff Hulett, Tc
Defendant Johnson County Sheriff's Office
Photo of Hon. Hauber (d 7), David W

Judge

Hon. Hauber (d 7), David W

Johnson County (KS)

Kansas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Complete Case History Changed Case Status: From: PENDING To: TERMINATED (DISMISSED)
  2. Complete Case History Plt Pro Se address: HOMELESSS, , KS
  3. Complete Case History FILE STAMP 7/26/2022, NOTICE FOR NON-STATUTORY WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS A STATE RIGHT INVOKED TO REMEDY A JUDGMENT MADE IN VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS VACATE JUDGMENT UNDER JURISDICTION OF ADJUDICATED FACT MURRAY LESSEE V HOBOKEN LAND & IMPROVEMENT CO 59 US 272 SUPREME COURT 1856 AND FEDERAL RULE 60(B)(3) OR A STATE STATUTE EQUIVALENT CORPUS
  4. Complete Case History FILE STAMP 7/26/2022, POVERTY AFFIDAVIT
  5. Judge: Case Reassigned - No Longer I.A.D. Judge DAVID W HAUBER reassigned to case PERSONAL CONFLICT
  6. Complete Case History FILE STAMP 07/28/22, ORDER REGARDING WAIVER OF FEES (COURT WILL DETERMINE AT FINAL HEARING IF EITHER PARTY IS ABLE TO PAY)
  7. Complete Case History FILE STAMP 7/29/2022, IT IS THE MINISTERIAL DUTY FOR THE CLERK EMPLOYEES TO ACCEPT DELIVERY AND DOCKET MOTION PLEADINGS IT IS NOT THE MINISTERIAL DUTY OF A CLERK EMPLOYEE TO READ PAPERWORK AND ACT AS A TRIBUNAL AND REJECT MOTION PLEADINGS IT IS NOT THE MINISTERIAL DUTY OF A CLERK TO ACCEPT MOTION PLEADINGS AND REQUIRE THE UNDERSIGNED TO WAIT A FEW MINUTES SO A COURT EMPLOYEE MAY WALK AWAY WITH MOTION PLEADINGS AND DELIVER THEM TO A JUDGE OR JUDGE SURROGATE TO REVIEW MOTION PLEADINGS WHILE NOT BEFORE THE PUBLIC IN OPEN COURT THIS IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS THE CLERK OF THE COURT IS REQUIRED BY SUPREME COURT LAW [UNITED STATES V. LOMBARDO, 241 US 73 - SUPREME COURT 1916], UNITED STATES CODE 18 USC SECTION 2076 AND FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5 SERVING AND FILING PLEADINGS AND OTHER PAPERS
  8. Complete Case History FILE STAMP 8/5/2022, REQUEST AND SERVICE INSTRUCTION FORM
  9. ELECTRONIC ENTRY OF APPEARANCE BY KIRK T RIDGWAY AS A DEFENSE ATTORNEY FOR JOHNSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
  10. FILE STAMP 8/29/2022, ORDER TO CLERK OF COURT TO PERFORM SPECIFIC MINISTERIAL ACTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES MATTER "UNITED STATES VS LOMBARDO 241 US 73, 79-77, 36 S CT. 508, 60L ED 897
  11. FILE STAMP 8/8/2022, RETURN OF SERVICE
  12. PETITION, SUMMONS, AFFIDAVIT, ORDER AND NOTICE ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR CERTIFIED MAIL "JOHNSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE" E/S
  13. FILE STAMP 8/5/2022, REQUEST AND SERVICE INSTRUCTION FORM
  14. FILE STAMP 7/29/2022, IT IS THE MINISTERIAL DUTY FOR THE CLERK EMPLOYEES TO ACCEPT DELIVERY AND DOCKET MOTION PLEADINGS IT IS NOT THE MINISTERIAL DUTY OF A CLERK EMPLOYEE TO READ PAPERWORK AND ACT AS A TRIBUNAL AND REJECT MOTION PLEADINGS IT IS NOT THE MINISTERIAL DUTY OF A CLERK TO ACCEPT MOTION PLEADINGS AND REQUIRE THE UNDERSIGNED TO WAIT A FEW MINUTES SO A COURT EMPLOYEE MAY WALK AWAY WITH MOTION PLEADINGS AND DELIVER THEM TO A JUDGE OR JUDGE SURROGATE TO REVIEW MOTION PLEADINGS WHILE NOT BEFORE THE PUBLIC IN OPEN COURT THIS IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS THE CLERK OF THE COURT IS REQUIRED BY SUPREME COURT LAW [UNITED STATES V. LOMBARDO, 241 US 73 - SUPREME COURT 1916], UNITED STATES CODE 18 USC SECTION 2076 AND FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5 SERVING AND FILING PLEADINGS AND OTHER PAPERS
  15. FILE STAMP 07/28/22, ORDER REGARDING WAIVER OF FEES (COURT WILL DETERMINE AT FINAL HEARING IF EITHER PARTY IS ABLE TO PAY)
  16. Judge DAVID W HAUBER reassigned to case PERSONAL CONFLICT
  17. FILE STAMP 7/26/2022, POVERTY AFFIDAVIT
  18. FILE STAMP 7/26/2022, NOTICE FOR NON-STATUTORY WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS A STATE RIGHT INVOKED TO REMEDY A JUDGMENT MADE IN VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS VACATE JUDGMENT UNDER JURISDICTION OF ADJUDICATED FACT MURRAY LESSEE V HOBOKEN LAND & IMPROVEMENT CO 59 US 272 SUPREME COURT 1856 AND FEDERAL RULE 60(B)(3) OR A STATE STATUTE EQUIVALENT CORPUS
  19. Plt Pro Se address: HOMELESSS, , KS
  20. Judge: JAMES F VANO Assigned to Case

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more