Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Arkansas Unified County

Court

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-10
Status Closed - CASE Closed
Type Ma - Misdemeanor Appeal
Docket 93 entries

Parties

Plaintiff State of Arkansas
Defendant Rosenzweig, Jeffrey Marx|jackson, Kuntrell Obryan

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. APPEAL FILED IN CIRCUIT COURT
  2. none.
  3. No Images
  4. MOF APPEAL
  5. none.
  6. No Images
  7. AFFIDAVIT FILED
  8. AFFIDAVIT OF APPEAL WITH EXHIBITS ATTACHED AND FILED.
  9. AFFIDAVIT
  10. MOTION WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
  11. none.
  12. MOTION
  13. FILING - OTHER
  14. ATTORNEY OF RECORD ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COURT DATE (PLEA & ARRAIGNMENT DATE) AND DUTY TO PROVIDE ADDRESS INFORMATION. DEFENDANT TO APPEAR ON 03/29/2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
  15. OTHER
  16. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  17. none.
  18. OTHER
  19. MOTION OTHER
  20. Motion for Immediate Release from Custody with Exhibit Attached
  21. MOTION
  22. DOCKET TEXT
  23. Hearing by Zoom on Rosenzweig's motion for def's immediate release from custody. He, Jacob Holmes, Chris Brown, the defendant and I all appeared by Zoom. CCR Wright reported the hearing. Exhibits tendered by Brown prior to the hearing via email rec'd into evidence by agreement. Confusion has arisen regarding the number of misdemeanors dealt with in a close period of time. Two appeals have been filed, and uncertainty exists regarding bonds that may have been posted. Holmes is to supplement any information he is able to obtain regarding bonds posted, and the hearing will resume tomorrow for consideration of that information. In the interim, pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. Rule 36(d), this Court concludes that it has acquired jurisdiction based upon the filing of the initial affidavit. Further, upon motion of the defendant, the clerk of district court is ordered to prepare, certify, and file a record in the circuit court, also pursuant to rule 36(d). All remaining issues including Rosenzweig's request for def to be released are reserved until tomorrow morning's Zoom hearing. 11:00. CGT
  24. No Images
  25. ORDER OTHER
  26. Order to District Court Clerk to Prepare, Certify and File Record with the Circuit court
  27. ORDER
  28. NO ACTION TAKEN
  29. none.
  30. No Images
  31. MOTION OTHER
  32. Supplement to Motion for Immediate Release from Custody
  33. MOTION
  34. ORDER RELIEVE ATTORNEY OF RECD
  35. none.
  36. ORDER
  37. DOCKET TEXT
  38. Zoom hearing at 11:00 today in this case and in companion case 20-60. Appearances: defendant, atty J. Rosenzweig, former atty Jake Holmes, DPA Chris Brown, CCR Sandra Wright and myself. Hearing was continued from yesterday to allow attorneys additional time to submit documents regarding def's bond. Additional documentation rec'd as exhibit today w/o obj. In this case, the defendant waived FA and entered plea of NG. (As such, def's P/A date of 3/29 is no longer necessary. DPA Brown asked to notify Sarah Kelley-Ramsey so this case will not appear on the docket for that date). This case and the companion case are to be transferred to Division 5. Division 5 already has several other cases involving this defendant. All pending cases will be set for Division 5's upcoming chambers day and trial term. Defendant is advised of those dates and is informed of consequences of FTA. In this case, defendant's motion for immediate release is granted. In the companion case, def was required to post a $5K cash only bond. In this case, he has posted a $2500 bond on the charge of viol of no contact order - totaling $7500 between the two cases. To require an additional cash only bond of $15,300 overlooks the fact that the def has already posted $2500 in 21-5104, and is the equivalent of 10% of a $153,000 C/S bond. The court finds this amount to unreasonable given the misdemeanor nature of the charges, that the amount is punitive in nature, and that it has the effect of hindering his right to appeal. Defendant's appearance bond in this case will be the same as what the defendant has posted in both cases involving misdemeanor criminal appeals (this case and 22-60) pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 36. Conditions include that def remains under no contact orders stemming from these cases in addition to other conditions stated on the record. Yesterday, upon defense motion, the court approved an order requiring the district clerk to prepare and tender the transcript for the cases appealed within this case number also pursuant to Rule 36. Rosenzeig to submit orders from today's hearing. CGT
  39. No Images
  40. ORDER RELEASE
  41. Order for Immediate Release From Custody
  42. ORDER
  43. NO ACTION TAKEN
  44. none.
  45. No Images
  46. ORDER - SCHEDULING ORDER
  47. Order for Continuance, Transfer of Certain Cases and Permitting Withdrawal of Counsel M/P SCHEDULED FOR 06/02/2022 AND TERM 06/20 - 06/24/2022
  48. ORDER
  49. TRANSCRIPT
  50. APPEAL TRANSCRIPT, FILED. (DISTRICT COURT DOCKET NUMBER 2021-03195)
  51. PLEADING
  52. FULL CASH/CASH BOND
  53. APPEAL BOND, FILED. (DISTRICT COURT DOCKET NUMBER 2021-03195)
  54. BOND
  55. TRANSCRIPT
  56. APPEAL TRANSCRIPT, FILED. (DISTRICT COURT DOCKET NUMBER 2021-03196)
  57. PLEADING
  58. FULL CASH/CASH BOND
  59. APPEAL BOND, FILED. (DISTRICT COURT DOCKET NUMBER 2021-03196)
  60. BOND
  61. TRANSCRIPT
  62. APPEAL TRANSCRIPT, FILED. (DISTRICT COURT DOCKET NUMBER 2021-05104)
  63. PLEADING
  64. FULL CASH/CASH BOND
  65. APPEAL BOND, FILED. (DISTRICT COURT DOCKET NUMBER 2021-05104)
  66. BOND
  67. TRANSCRIPT
  68. APPEAL TRANSCRIPT, FILED. (DISTRICT COURT DOCKET NUMBER 2021-05105)
  69. PLEADING
  70. FULL CASH/CASH BOND
  71. APPEAL BOND, FILED. (DISTRICT COURT DOCKET NUMBER 2021-05105)
  72. BOND
  73. TRANSCRIPT
  74. APPEAL TRANSCRIPT, FILED. (DISTRICT COURT DOCKET NUMBER 2021-05106)
  75. PLEADING
  76. FULL CASH/CASH BOND
  77. APPEAL BOND, FILED. (DISTRICT COURT DOCKET NUMBER 2021-05106)
  78. BOND
  79. TRANSCRIPT
  80. APPEAL TRANSCRIPT, FILED. (DISTRICT COURT DOCKET NUMBER 2021-05107)
  81. PLEADING
  82. FULL CASH/CASH BOND
  83. APPEAL BOND, FILED. (DISTRICT COURT DOCKET NUMBER 2021-05107)
  84. BOND
  85. MOD JUDGMENT/DECREE/ORDER
  86. TRIAL TYPE: N
  87. No Images
  88. ORDER NOLLE PROSEQUI
  89. none.
  90. ORDER
  91. CASE CLOSED
  92. none.
  93. No Images

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more