Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Arkansas Unified County

Court

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-02-25
Status Closed - CASE Closed
Type Ma - Misdemeanor Appeal
Docket 45 entries

Parties

Plaintiff State of Arkansas
Defendant Rosenzweig, Jeffrey Marx|jackson, Kuntrell Obryan

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. APPEAL FILED IN CIRCUIT COURT
  2. none.
  3. PLEADING
  4. MOF APPEAL
  5. none.
  6. No Images
  7. FULL CASH/CASH BOND
  8. APPEAL BOND, FILED
  9. BOND
  10. TRANSCRIPT
  11. APPEAL TRANSCRIPT, FILED
  12. PLEADING
  13. FULL CASH/CASH BOND
  14. APPEAL BOND, FILED
  15. BOND
  16. TRANSCRIPT
  17. APPEAL TRANSCRIPT, FILED
  18. PLEADING
  19. FULL CASH/CASH BOND
  20. APPEAL BOND , FILED
  21. BOND
  22. FILING - OTHER
  23. ATTORNEY OF RECORD ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF COURT DATE (PLEA & ARRAIGNMENT DATE) AND DUTY TO PROVIDE ADDRESS INFORMATION. DEFENDANT TO APPEAR ON 03/03/2022 AT 9:30 A.M.
  24. OTHER
  25. ORDER TO WITHDRAW
  26. ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE AND FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL. A REVIEW SHALL BE SET FOR JUDGE BIBB'S CHAMBER DAY ON 05/06/2022, THE MOTION TO IMPOSE SHALL BE SET FOR TRIAL FOR THE TERM OF 06/20 - 06/24/2022. DEFENDANT'S ATTY OF RECORD JAKE HOLMES SHALL BE PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW FROM DEFENDANT'S MATTERS. (SENT TO THE S/O FOR DEFENDANT'S SIGNATURE)
  27. ORDER
  28. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  29. none.
  30. PLEADING
  31. DOCKET TEXT
  32. Zoom hearing at 11:00 today in this case and in companion case 20-61. Appearances: defendant, atty J. Rosenzweig, former atty Jake Holmes, DPA Chris Brown, CCR Sandra Wright and myself. Hearing was continued from yesterday to allow attorneys additional time to submit documents regarding def's bond. In this case, the defendant waived FA and entered plea of NG. This case and the companion case are to be transferred to Division 5. This case is already assigned a criminal chambers day and trial term on Division 5's docket. The review date set 5/6 is to be removed in amended continuance order because that was a date set to confirm counsel, and that is no longer an issue. Def is advised of his court dates with this case and advised his FTA may result in adverse consequences to him. He has already posted a bond on the three cases that make up this misdemeanor appeal. CGT
  33. No Images
  34. ORDER - SCHEDULING ORDER
  35. Order for Continuance, Transfer of Certain Cases and Permitting Withdrawal of Counsel M/P SCHEDULED FOR 06/02/2022 AND TERM 06/20 - 06/24/2022
  36. ORDER
  37. ORDER NOLLE PROSEQUI
  38. none.
  39. No Images
  40. MOD JUDGMENT/DECREE/ORDER
  41. TRIAL TYPE: N
  42. No Images
  43. CASE CLOSED
  44. none.
  45. No Images

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more