Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-05-14
Type Cc Adult Abuse Stalking
Docket 37 entries
Disposition Tried by Court-Civil

Parties

Defendant Horning, Steven A
Photo of Hon. Pyle Thomas G

Judge

Hon. Pyle Thomas G

Barton County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Ord of Prot Returned Non-Est Document ID - 22-AFOP-86; Served To - STEVENA.HORNING; Server - SHERIFF OF VERNON COUNTY-NEVADA; Served Date - 07/26/2023; Served Time - 10:39:00; Service Type - SD; Reason Description - NEST; Service Text -NON-EST: EXPIRED
  3. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  4. Ord Term Order of Protection COPY OF TERMINATION OF ORDER OF PROTECTION DELIVERED TO CCSO AND RECEIVED BY SW AT 14:34, 12/02/2022. nw
  5. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  6. Motion to Term Order of Prot MOTION TO TERMINATE FULL ORDER OF PROTECTION - ADULT Filed By: Petitioner Acting Pro Se
  7. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  8. JFULL Submitted Electronically Full Order was submitted for electronic processing
  9. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  10. JFULL Submitted Electronically Full Order was submitted for electronic processing
  11. Protection Order Issued Document ID: 22-AFOP-86, for HORNING, STEVEN A. DELIVERED TO CCSO TO CARLA LOWE ON 07/27/2022 AT 15:50. mdg
  12. Judmt Full Order Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Original Expiration Date - 26-JUL-2023; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Located at - ANY PLACE THAT PETITIONER MAY BE LOCATED; Additional Orders by Court - YES; Terms of additional orders - RESPONDENT NOT TO BE WITHIN 100 FEET OF PETITIONER; Petp granted poss/residence - YES
  13. Full Order of Protection
  14. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  15. Sound Recording Log Sheet
  16. Tried by Court-Civil
  17. Adult Abuse Hearing Held JUDGE'S DOCKET ENTRY: Petitioner appears in person, pro se. Respondent appears not. Full Order of Protection issued. /s/ TP mdg Associated Entries: 06/02/2022 - Adult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 07/26/2022; 1:30 PM; THOMAS G PYLE; Cedar
  18. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  19. Sched Hrng Submt Electronicaly SCAA Submitted Electronically and associates it to SCAA - Adult Abuse Hearing scheduled
  20. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  21. OEXPA Submitted Electronically Ex Parte Order modifications was submitted for electronic processing
  22. Sched Hrng Submt Electronicaly SCAA Submitted Electronically and associates it to SCAA - Adult Abuse Hearing scheduled
  23. ExParte Order of Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Located at - ANYWHERE THE PETITIONER MAY BE LOCATED; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Additional orders by Court - YES; Terms of additional orders - RESPONDENT NOT TO BE WITHIN 300 FEET OF PETITIONER
  24. Adult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 07/26/2022 - Adult Abuse Hearing Held + Scheduled For: 07/26/2022; 1:30 PM; THOMAS G PYLE; Cedar
  25. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  26. Hearing Continued/Rescheduled JUDGE'S DOCKET ENTRY. Both parties appear and agree to continuance. Hearing to be held on 7-26-2022 at 1:30pm. Ex Parte Order to remain in effect until time of hearing. /s/TP st Associated Entries: 05/14/2022 - Adult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Hearing Continued From: 05/31/2022; 1:30 PM Adult Abuse Hearing
  27. Ord of Protection Served Document ID - 22-AEOP-163; Served To - HORNING, STEVEN A; Server - SHERIFF OF VERNON COUNTY-NEVADA; Served Date - 24-MAY-22; Served Time - 08:46:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served
  28. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  29. Ex Parte Order Issued Document ID: 22-AEOP-163, for HORNING, STEVEN A.
  30. Ord of Prot Returned Non-Est Document ID - 22-AEOP-159; Served To - HORNING, STEVEN A; Server - SHERIFF OF CEDAR COUNTY - STOCKTON; Served Date - 19-MAY-22; Served Time - 09:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Non-est; Service Text - NON EST - VERNON CO ADDRESS
  31. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  32. OEXPA Submitted Electronically Ex Parte Order was submitted for electronic processing
  33. ExParte Order of Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Located at - ANYWHERE THE PETITIONER MAY BE LOCATED; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Additional orders by Court - YES; Terms of additional orders - RESPONDENT NOT TO BE WITHIN 300 FEET OF PETITIONER
  34. Ex Parte Order Issued Document ID: 22-AEOP-159, for HORNING, STEVEN A. DELIVERED TO CCSO ON 5-14-22 AT 20:41 SIGNED BY S.B. st
  35. Adult Abuse Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 05/31/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled + Scheduled For: 05/31/2022; 1:30 PM; THOMAS G PYLE; Cedar
  36. Confid Filing Info Sheet Filed
  37. Pet for Protection Ord Filed PET Relationship to RES - CHILD-IN-COMMON

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more