Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-06-21
Type Cc Adult Abuse Stalking
Docket 6 entries
Disposition other final disposition

Parties

Plaintiff Acting Pro Se
Defendant Tramel, Jacqueline Krystal
Photo of Hon. Pyle Thomas G

Judge

Hon. Pyle Thomas G

Barton County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. udge Assigned
  2. ther Final Disposition
  3. rder - Denied
  4. udge/Clerk - Note Judge's Docket Sheet: Court reviews petition and finds that a previous order concerning custody of the child is in place in Case No. 19CD-CV00462; and a Motion to Modify pending therein. IAW RSMo. 455.513.1 no ex parte relief regarding the child may be granted and same is therefore denied. See Zuehlke v. Zuehlke (in Re J.M.Z.), 983 S.W.2d 573, (Mo. Ct. App. 1998). No showing of immediate and present danger. Petitioner was served with process in the modification and any requests regarding communication between the parties and the Child, etc. should be directed to that Court by proper Motion. Petition dismissed. /s/ TP
  5. onfid Filing Info Sheet Filed
  6. et for Protection Ord Filed PET Relationship to RES - EX-SPOUSE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more