Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Clarke County

Court

Clarke County

Georgia

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-06-14
Status CL
Type Contract Account
Docket 56 entries
Disposition consent judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Midland Credit Management, Inc ,
Defendant Konenkamp , Peter
Photo of Hon. ETHELYN N. SIMPSON

Judge

Hon. ETHELYN N. SIMPSON

Clarke County (GA)

Georgia

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CONSENT JUDGMENT ORDER
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. EFILED DOCUMENT:AFFIDAVIT
  4. MOTION: APPOINT SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER
  5. PROPOSED ORDER
  6. SUMMONS
  7. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO APPOINT PROCESS SERVER
  8. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE- SERVED SUBSTITUTE SERVICE DARLENE KONENKAMP JUNE 25, 2022 FOR PETER KONENKAMP
  9. PROPOSED ORDER-CONSENT JUDGMENT
  10. PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO APPOINT SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER
  11. PROPOSED ORDER
  12. SUMMONS
  13. ORDER TO APPOINT SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER
  14. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE ON 8-18-2022 FOR DEFENDANT: SHUNDRIKA SHERRER
  15. CERTIFICATE IN SUPPORT OF DJ
  16. EFILED DOCUMENT:MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
  17. MOTION: DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  18. PROPOSED JUDGMENT ORDER
  19. DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  20. AFFIDAVIT OF GARNISHMENT
  21. CASE INITIATION FORM
  22. EFILED DOCUMENT:SHERIFFS ENTRY OF SERVICE
  23. EFILED DOCUMENT:SUMMONS SHERIFF DEPARTMENT TO CCSD
  24. LAST DAY TO ANSWER 6-16-2025
  25. SHERIFF RETURN OF SERVICE- SERVED CORPORATION (DANA MCDANIEL) ON 6/16/2022
  26. PLAINTIFF'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT- CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT
  27. ANSWER OF GARNISHMENT $542.54 PAID
  28. EFILED DOCUMENT:PLTF'S APPLICATION FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS
  29. ANSWER OF GARNISHMENT $1085.08 PAID
  30. CHANGE OF ADDRESS FOR MANDARICH LAW GROUP
  31. ANSWER OF GARNISHMENT $32.75 PAID
  32. PROPOSED ORDER OF DISBURSEMENT (AMOUNT SHOULD BE $1,627.62)
  33. ORDER OF DISBURSEMENT $1627.62
  34. CHECK 23360 $1627.62 MAILED TO ATTORNEY
  35. CASE INITIATION FORM
  36. COMPLAINT
  37. EFILED DOCUMENT:AFFIDAVIT
  38. MOTION: APPOINT SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER
  39. PROPOSED ORDER
  40. SUMMONS
  41. ORDER TO APPOINT SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER
  42. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS, COMPLAINT, EXHIBIT
  43. CERTIFICATE IN SUPPORT OF DJ
  44. EFILED DOCUMENT:MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
  45. MOTION: DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  46. PROPOSED JUDGMENT ORDER
  47. JUDGMENT ORDER
  48. CASE INITIATION FORM
  49. COMPLAINT
  50. EFILED DOCUMENT:AFFIDAVIT
  51. MOTION: APPOINT SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER
  52. PROPOSED ORDER
  53. SUMMONS
  54. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO APPOINT PROCESS SERVER
  55. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE- SERVED SUBSTITUTE SERVICE DARLENE KONENKAMP JUNE 25, 2022 FOR PETER KONENKAMP
  56. PROPOSED ORDER-CONSENT JUDGMENT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more