Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Randall Co County Civil

Court

Randall Co County Civil

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-05-02
Status Filed
Type Real Property
Docket 38 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Craig, Daniel Wood|Long, Enoch John
Defendant City Of Amarillo, Texas
Photo of Hon. Estevez Ana

Judge

Hon. Estevez Ana

Randall County (TX)

Texas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Original Petition (OCA) AND APPLICATION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION
  2. CIVIL SCHEDULE REVIEW-18 Months
  3. REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE CITATION
  4. CITATION ISSUED MAYOR, GINGER NELSON
  5. CITATION ISSUED CITY SECRETARY, STEPHANIE COGGINS
  6. CITATION SERVED STEPHANIE COGGINS
  7. CITATION SERVED GINGER NELSON
  8. ANSWER DEFENDANT'S ORIGINAL ANSWER
  9. MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS SUBSTANTIVE ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND TO DETERMINE SUFFICIENCY OF DEFENDANT'S ANSWERS AND OBJECTIONS TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS PURSUANT TO TEXAS RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 215.4
  10. NOTICE OF HEARING SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 AT 10:30 AM VIA ZOOM
  11. ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL
  12. MOTION TO COMPEL (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Estevez, Ana)
  13. COUNTERCLAIM CITY OF AMARILLO TEXAS SECND AMENDED ANSWER & COUNTERCLAIM
  14. RULE 11 AGREEMENT
  15. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
  16. PROPOSED ORDER - E-FILED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEYS - SENT TO JUDGE ESTEVEZ
  17. UNSIGNED ORDER (RETURNED BY JUDGE) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTONREYS - PLEASE HAVE CLIENT EITHER SIGN ORDER OR MOTION SHOWING THE CLIENT'S CONSENT
  18. NOTICE OF CHANGE OF FIRM AFFILIATION AND CONTACT INFORMATION AND DESIGNATION OF LEAD COUNSEL
  19. MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  20. MOTION CITY OF AMARILLO'S MOTION FOR TRADITIONAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  21. PROPOSED ORDER ORDER SETTING HEARING - SENT TO JUDGE ESTEVEZ
  22. PROPOSED ORDER ORDER SETTING HEARING - SENT TO JUDGE ESTEVEZ
  23. UNSIGNED ORDER (RETURNED BY JUDGE) REFILE ORDER WITH ZOOM INVITE
  24. ORDER SETTING HEARING SEPTEMBER 25, 2023 AT 11:00 AM
  25. NOTICE OF HEARING SEPTEMBER 25, 2023 AT 11:00 AM
  26. DESIGNATION PLAINTIFFS' (1) DESIGNATION OF EVIDENCE IN OPPOSITION TO, AND (2) RESPONSE TO CITY OF AMARILLO'S MOTION FOR TRADITIONAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, (3) SUPPLEMENTAL ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF ITS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (4) OBJECTION TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR TRADITIONAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  27. RESPONSE CITY OF AMARILLO'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  28. ANSWER CITY OF AMARILLO - KINZIE JOHNSON
  29. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDG.-ORAL (11:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Estevez, Ana)
  30. ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY DAWSON AND SODD,PLLC
  31. MOTION PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CONTINUE COURT'S RULING ON AMARILLO'S PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND LANDOWNERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND OTHER RELATED MOTIONS FOR 60 DAYS AND TO ALLOW THE PARTIES TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL BRIEFING, LEGAL SUPPORT, AND EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO THE LEGAL ISSUE(S) BEFORE THE COUR
  32. PROPOSED ORDER ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONTINUE COURT'S RULING ON AMARILLO'S PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND LANDOWNERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND OTHER RELATED MOTIONS FOR 60 DAYS AND TO ALLOW THE PARTIES TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL BRIEFING, LEGAL SUPPORT, AND EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO THE LEGAL ISSUE(S) BEFORE THE COURT - SENT TO JUDGE ESTEVEZ
  33. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONTINUE COURT'S RULING ON AMARILLO'S PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND OTHER RELATED MOTIONS FOR 60 DAYS AND TO ALLOW THE PARENTS TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL BRIEFING, LEGAL SUPPORT. AND EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO THE LEGAL ISSUES BEFORE THE COURT
  34. CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITION OF KYLE SCHNIEDERJAN - SEPTEMBER 19, 2023
  35. PROPOSED ORDER AGREED ORDER ALLOWING THE PARTIES TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL BRIEFING, LEGAL SUPPORT AND EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO THE LEFAL ISSUE(S) BEFORE THE COURT - SENT TO JUDGE ESTEVEZ
  36. BRIEF PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF AND SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MPSJ AND FURTHER RESPONSE TO AMARILLO'S MSJ
  37. ORDER ALLOWING THE PARTIES TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL BRIEFING, LEGAL SUPPORT, AND EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO THE LEGAL ISSUE(S) BEFORE THE COURT
  38. REPLY CITY OF AMARILLO'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' FURTHER RESPONSE TO CITY OF AMARILLO'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RESPONSE TO PLAINTFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF AND SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more