Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Arkansas Unified County

Court

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-05-06
Status FINAL - FINAL
Type Wm Writ Of Mandamus Cr
Docket 38 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Williams, Mark Antonio
Defendant Attorney General|Warthen, Christopher R.|Johnson, Darnisa C Evans
Photo of Hon. Ross Quincey Maurice

Judge

Hon. Ross Quincey Maurice

Arkansas County (AR)

Arkansas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PARTIAL RECORD LODGED
  2. 1 volume; 32 pages.
  3. No Images
  4. LOWER COURT INFORMATION
  5. none.
  6. No Images
  7. PRO SE PET FOR WRIT MANDAMUS
  8. Petitioner's pro se petition for writ of mandamus.
  9. PETITION
  10. LETTER TO APPELLANT
  11. Acknowledging receipt and filing of pro se petition for writ of mandamus.
  12. LETTER
  13. MOTION SUBMITTED
  14. Petitioner's pro se petition for writ of mandamus.
  15. No Images
  16. FORMAL ORDERS - SC
  17. Petitioner's pro se petition for writ of mandamus. Response requested. Womack, J., would grant. The Attorney General's Office, as representative for the respondent, is requested to file a response to the pro se petition for writ of mandamus filed in this court within ten days of the date of this per curiam order (July 3, 2022).
  18. ORDER
  19. EFILING NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  20. none.
  21. No Images
  22. RESPONSE TO PETITION
  23. Respondent's response to petition for writ of mandamus.
  24. RESPONSE
  25. MOTION SUBMITTED
  26. Petitioner's pro se petition for writ of mandamus.
  27. No Images
  28. FORMAL ORDERS - SC
  29. Petitioner's pro se petition for writ of mandamus is moot.
  30. ORDER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more