Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Arkansas Unified County

Court

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-05-20
Status FINAL - FINAL
Type Wv Writ Of Certiorari Cv
Docket 59 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Wagoner, Tony Dale
Defendant Rhoads, George R|Deans, Terry Ann|Treece, Ginger Lea|Williams, Ralph|Watkins, Bill|Wagoner, Patricia Ann|Guinn, Clarence|Johnson, Ronnie Scott|Lowther Jr , Edwin L|Wood, Stephen Lee|Hatfield, Andrew Hunter|Curry, Andrew T|Williams, Ralph Cavin|Gray, Jennifer Erin|Campbell, Craig
Photo of Hon. Smith Thomas E

Judge

Hon. Smith Thomas E

Arkansas County (AR)

Arkansas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. PARTIAL RECORD LODGED $
  2. 1 volume partial record lodged.
  3. No Images
  4. PET FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
  5. Petitioner's pro se petition for writ of certiorari.
  6. PETITION
  7. PAYMENT RECEIVED
  8. A Payment of -$165.00 was made on receipt ARSC2838.
  9. No Images
  10. LETTER TO APPELLANT
  11. Acknowledging receipt and filing of pro se petition for writ of certiorari.
  12. LETTER
  13. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  14. Entry of appearance of Andrew H. Hatfield on behalf of respondents.
  15. MOTION
  16. RESPONSE TO PETITION
  17. Response of separate respondents Patricia Ann Wagoner and Ginger Lea Treece to petition for writ of certiorari.
  18. RESPONSE
  19. EFILING NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  20. none.
  21. No Images
  22. RESPONSE TO PETITION
  23. Response of separate respondent Bill Watkins to petition for writ of certiorari.
  24. RESPONSE
  25. MOTION SUBMITTED
  26. Petitioner's pro se petition for writ of certiorari.
  27. No Images
  28. REPLY IN SUPP OF MOT TENDERED
  29. Petitioner's pro se tendered reply to response to petition for writ of certiorari.
  30. Tendered Reply
  31. FORMAL ORDERS - SC
  32. Petitioner's pro se petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
  33. ORDER
  34. EFILING NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  35. none.
  36. No Images
  37. MOTION SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL
  38. Motion of George R. Rhoads to substitute counsel on behalf of separate respondent Craig Campbell.
  39. MOTION
  40. MOTION SUBMITTED
  41. Motion of George R. Rhoads to substitute counsel on behalf of separate respondent Craig Campbell.
  42. No Images
  43. LETTER ORDERS - SC
  44. Motion of George R. Rhoads to substitute counsel on behalf of separate respondent Craig Campbell is granted.
  45. ORDER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more