Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Middlesex County

Court

Middlesex County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-02-22
Type P 20 Property Quiet Title/discharge Of Mortgage Or Lien
Docket 91 entries
Disposition judgment after completed trial to the court for the defendant(s)

Parties

Plaintiff Richard Finkelstein
Defendant 45 Lake Drive, Llc
Photo of Hon. Cynthia Swienton

Judge

Hon. Cynthia Swienton

Middlesex County (CT)

Connecticut

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ROPOSED JUDGMENT FILE
  2. OMPLAINT
  3. PPEARANCE Appearance
  4. ETURN OF SERVICE
  5. IS PENDENS
  6. ETURN OF SERVICE Return of service - Lis Pendens
  7. OTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 RESULT: Denied 3/29/2022 BY THE CLERK
  8. RDER RESULT: Denied 3/29/2022 BY THE CLERK
  9. OTION TO STRIKE w/ attached Memorandum of Law RESULT: Order 8/4/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  10. RDER RESULT: Order 8/4/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  11. EMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE PB 10-40 Plaintiff's memo of law opposing defendant's motion to strike
  12. XHIBITS Exhibit A to memo opposing motion to strike - Caesar v. Cassarino
  13. XHIBITS Exhibit B to memo opposing motion to strike - HSBC Bank v. Bliss
  14. EPLY Reply to Plaintiff?s Objection to Defendant?s Motion to Strike (#105.00)
  15. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE Motion to continue 6/14/22 arguments on motion #104.00 due to schedule conflict for plaintiff's atty RESULT: Granted 6/9/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  16. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/9/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  17. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE motion to continue date by which parties must file case scheduling order RESULT: Granted 6/13/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  18. RDER RESULT: Granted 6/13/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  19. UBSTITUTED COMPLAINT
  20. EQUEST TO AMEND COMPLAINT/AMENDMENT RESULT: Granted 9/6/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  21. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/6/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  22. CHEDULING ORDER Plaintiff counsel unilaterally filed proposed scheduling order - with explanatory cover sheet
  23. RDER RESULT: Order 8/23/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  24. BJECTION Objection to Premature Proposed Scheduling Order (#113.00) RESULT: Order 8/23/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  25. RDER RESULT: Order 8/23/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  26. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO AMEND RE: #112.00 RESULT: Overruled 9/6/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  27. RDER RESULT: Overruled 9/6/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  28. EPLY MEMORANDUM Plaintiff's reply memorandum to defendant's objections to request for leave to amend
  29. EQUEST FOR ARGUMENT - NON-ARG MATTER (JD-CV-128) Re: Request to Amend #112.00 RESULT: Denied 9/6/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  30. RDER RESULT: Denied 9/6/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  31. OTICE Notice of filing and service of exhibits to amended complaint
  32. CHEDULING ORDER Proposed Scheduling Order by the Plaintiff RESULT: Order 9/22/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  33. RDER Scheduling Order RESULT: Order 9/22/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  34. OTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 10/19/2022 BY THE CLERK
  35. RDER RESULT: Granted 10/19/2022 BY THE CLERK
  36. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE
  37. OTION TO CONSOLIDATE RESULT: Denied 11/14/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  38. RDER RESULT: Denied 11/14/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  39. BJECTION TO MOTION Plaintiff's objection to defendant's motion to consolidate cases for trial RESULT: Sustained 11/14/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  40. RDER RESULT: Sustained 11/14/2022 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  41. XHIBITS Exhibit A to objected filed to motion to consolidate
  42. XHIBITS Exhibit B to objection to motion to consolidate
  43. EQUEST TO REVISE Plaintiff's requests to revise special defenses
  44. OTICE Notice of Service of Defendant's Discovery Requests
  45. OTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Denied 1/23/2023 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  46. RDER RESULT: Denied 1/23/2023 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  47. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE RESULT: Order 1/23/2023 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  48. RDER RESULT: Order 1/23/2023 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  49. EPLY Plaintiff's reply to defendant's objections to requests to revise special defenses RESULT: Order 1/23/2023 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  50. RDER RESULT: Order 1/23/2023 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  51. OTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Granted 1/17/2023 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  52. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/17/2023 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  53. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  54. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  55. AMENDED SPECIAL DEFENSE
  56. MOTION TO STRIKE RESULT: Order 4/13/2023 BY THE CLERK
  57. ORDER RESULT: Order 4/13/2023 BY THE CLERK
  58. ORDER RESULT: Granted 5/16/2023 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  59. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION Memorandum of law in support of motion to strike special defenses
  60. EXHIBITS Exhibit to memo - unreported superior court case - Travelers Property and Casualty v. Argento
  61. OBJECTION TO MOTION RE: Motion to Strike #136.00
  62. MOTION FOR NONSUIT FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ORDER
  63. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR NONSUIT Objection to motion for nonsuit - #140.00
  64. TRIAL MANAGEMENT REPORT Joint Trial Management Report
  65. CERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  66. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER Joint motion to amend scheduling order RESULT: Granted 11/17/2023 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  67. ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/17/2023 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  68. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE motion to continue trial to March 2024 per parties' joint amended scheduling order RESULT: Granted 11/17/2023 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  69. ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/17/2023 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  70. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS Plaintiff's expert witnesses disclosures
  71. TRIAL MANAGEMENT REPORT Defendant's Trial Mangement Report
  72. TRIAL MANAGEMENT REPORT
  73. LIST OF EXHIBITS (JD-CL-28/JD-CL-28a)
  74. LIST OF EXHIBITS (JD-CL-28/JD-CL-28a) Plaintiff's JD-CL-28/JD-CL-28a
  75. WITHDRAWAL OF CERTAIN COUNTS OF THE COMPLAINT
  76. BRIEF Plainitiff's trial brief as per statewide standing orders
  77. EXHIBITS Trial brief exhibit - Lazzerin v. Haiko unreported decision
  78. EXHIBITS Exhibit to trial brief Caesar, LLC v. Cassarino unreported decision
  79. OTION IN LIMINE
  80. RDER RESULT: Order 3/5/2024 HON CYNTHIA SWIENTON
  81. IST OF EXHIBITS (JD-CL-28/JD-CL-28a)
  82. EMORANDUM Plaintiff's post-trial legal memorandum
  83. XHIBITS
  84. XHIBITS Lazzerin v. Haiko, unreported superior court ruling cited in plaintiff's post-trial brief
  85. EPLY MEMORANDUM Defendant's Post-Trial Brief
  86. EPLY MEMORANDUM Plaintiff's reply memorandum post trial
  87. EMORANDUM OF DECISION
  88. UDGMENT AFTER COMPLETED TRIAL TO THE COURT FOR THE DEFENDANT(S) RESULT: HON CYNTHIA SWIENTON
  89. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPEAL RESULT: Granted 8/8/2024 HON LAURA BALDINI
  90. RDER RESULT: Granted 8/8/2024 HON LAURA BALDINI
  91. PPEAL TO APPELLATE COURT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more