Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Arkansas Unified County

Court

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-02-25
Status FINALSEAL - FINAL/RECORD SEALED
Type Ia Interlocutory Appeal
Docket 119 entries

Parties

Plaintiff The Travelers Indemnity Company|Younger, Robert Ryan|Chiles Iv, Emmett Bowers|Goldman, Stephen E.
Defendant Babcock Iv, Charles Lynde|Moran, David T|Rowan, Lucas Zachary|Castleberry, Kenneth P|Folsom, David|Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Arkansas
Photo of Hon. Fox Timothy Davis Shawn a Womack

Judge

Hon. Fox Timothy Davis Shawn a Womack

Arkansas County (AR)

Arkansas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. APPELLATE COVERSHEET
  2. Appellate court coversheet.
  3. No Images
  4. PARTIAL RECORD LODGED $
  5. E-filed partial record. Pleadings: 4 volumes; 375 pages.
  6. No Images
  7. MOTION FOR STAY
  8. Appellants' motion for emergency stay and incorporated memorandum of authorities.
  9. MOTION
  10. EXHIBITS
  11. LOWER COURT INFORMATION
  12. none.
  13. No Images
  14. PAYMENT RECEIVED
  15. A Payment of $165.00 was made on receipt ARSC2798.
  16. No Images
  17. RESPONSE TO MOTION
  18. The University's response in opposition to motion for emergency stay and incorporated memorandum of authorities.
  19. RESPONSE
  20. AMENDED MOTION
  21. Appellants' exhibit A to motion for emergency stay.
  22. EXHIBITS
  23. FORMAL ORDERS - SC
  24. Appellants' motion for emergency stay and incorporated memorandum of authorities. Expedited consideration granted; motion for emergency stay granted. Amended formal order issued this date.
  25. ORDER
  26. Amended Formal Order
  27. MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
  28. Appellants' motion for clarification of order on emergency motion for stay and incorporated memorandum of authorities; request for expedited consideration.
  29. MOTION
  30. EXHIBITS
  31. SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD TENDERED
  32. Electronic Supplemental Record Tendered; Pleadings.
  33. No Images
  34. MOT TO SUPP THE RECORD
  35. Appellant's motion to supplement the partial record.
  36. MOTION
  37. RESPONSE TO MOTION
  38. The University's response to motion for clarification of order on emergency motion for stay and incorporated memorandum of authorities.
  39. RESPONSE
  40. FORMAL ORDERS - SC
  41. Appellants' motion for clarification of order on emergency stay and incorporated memorandum of authorities; request for expedited consideration. Appellants' moton to supplement the partial record. Expedited consideration granted; motion for clarification granted as follows: this Court's stay of February 28, 2022 applied to all proceedings in the circuit court case. Wood, J., would clarify that the stay applied only to the disqualification of Stephen E. Goldman. Appellants' motion to supplement the partial record is granted. Kemp, C.J., and Baker and Hudson, JJ., would deny motion to supplement the partial record. Tendered electronic supplemental record filed this date.
  42. ORDER
  43. SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD LODGED
  44. Electronic supplemental record filed. 1 volume pleadings.
  45. No Images
  46. MOTION TO EXPEDITE
  47. Appellees' motion to expedite appeal and memorandum in support.
  48. MOTION
  49. RESPONSE TO MOTION
  50. Appellants' response to motion to expedite appeal.
  51. RESPONSE
  52. FORMAL ORDERS - SC
  53. Appellee's motion to expedite appeal. Expedited consideration granted; motion to expedite appeal granted. Kemp, C.J., and Womack, J., would deny motion to expedite appeal. Appellants' brief due by Monday, April 18, 2022; Appellee's brief due by Monday, May 2, 2022; Appellants' reply brief due by Thursday, May 12, 2022.
  54. ORDER
  55. RECORD LODGED
  56. E-filed record. Pleadings: 13 volumes; 4,288 pages. Transcript: 1 volume; 38 pages. No physical exhibits. Volume 8 of pleadings sealed in circuit court.
  57. No Images
  58. ACTIVE/RECORD SEALED
  59. Volume 8 of pleadings sealed in circuit court.
  60. No Images
  61. BRIEFING COMMENCED
  62. Appellants' brief due by Monday, April 18, 2022.
  63. Briefing Schedule
  64. APPELLANT'S BRIEF
  65. No paper copies required.
  66. BRIEF
  67. APPELLEE'S BRIEF
  68. Appellee's Brief e-filed by attorney. Paper copies not required.
  69. No Images
  70. REPLY BRIEF
  71. Reply Brief of Appellants Travelers Indemnity Company and Stephen E. Goldman. No paper copies requried.
  72. BRIEF
  73. CASE SUBMITTED
  74. none.
  75. No Images
  76. MAJORITY OPINION
  77. Reversed and remanded in part; dismissed in part. Webb, J., concurs. Womack, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.
  78. Majority Opinion
  79. Concurrence
  80. Concur Dissent in Part
  81. CLOSED/RECORD SEALED
  82. none.
  83. No Images
  84. OPINION PANEL
  85. none.
  86. No Images
  87. MANDATE TO CLERK
  88. none.
  89. Mandate
  90. FINAL/RECORD SEALED
  91. none.
  92. No Images

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more