Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Summit Co

Court

Summit Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-02-17
Type Promissory Note
Docket 71 entries
Disposition appeal is dismissed

Parties

Plaintiff Dyck O'neal, Inc
Defendant Kozlina, Mike
Photo of Hon. JENNIFER D. TOWELL

Judge

Hon. JENNIFER D. TOWELL

Summit County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed JENNIFER D. TOWELL
  2. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed JENNIFER D. TOWELL
  3. NOTICE ISSUED - CERTIFICATE OF MAILING TOWELL, JENNIFER D.
  4. CA-30872 ATTEMPTED APPEAL IS DISMISSED. APPEAL JUDGE JENNIFER HENSAL
  5. PRAECIPE TO THE COURT REPORTER FILED - GOWENS. THE REQUESTED HEARING WAS NOT CONDUCTED ON THE RECORD, THERE ARE NO TRANSCRIPTS TO BE PREPARED.
  6. PRAECIPE TO THE COURT REPORTER FILED - GOWENS. THE REQUESTED HEARING WAS NOT CONDUCTED ON THE RECORD, THERE ARE NO TRANSCRIPTS TO BE PREPARED.
  7. PRAECIPE TO THE COURT REPORTER - GOWENS. THE REQUESTED HEARING WAS NOT CONDUCTED ON THE RECORD, THERE ARE NO TRANSCRIPTS TO BE PREPARED.
  8. PRAECIPE TO THE COURT REPORTER - GOWENS. THE REQUESTED HEARING WAS NOT CONDUCTED ON THE RECORD, THERE ARE NO TRANSCRIPTS TO BE PREPARED.
  9. UNSIGNED PRAECIPE TO THE COURT REPORTER FILED - INTEROFFICED
  10. UNSIGNED PRAECIPE TO THE COURT REPORTER FILED - INTEROFFICED
  11. UNSIGNED PRAECIPE TO THE COURT REPORTER FILED - INTEROFFICED
  12. CA-30872 COURT OF APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT FILED
  13. CA-30872 NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED
  14. PRAECIPE TO COURT REPORTER FOR TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
  15. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed KIM MARIE HAMMOND
  16. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed SCOTT CARSON ESSAD
  17. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed DYCK-O'NEAL, INC
  18. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed MIKE KOZLINA
  19. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed SUZANA PASTOR
  20. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed SUZANA PASTOR
  21. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed SCOTT CARSON ESSAD
  22. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed MIKE KOZLINA
  23. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed KIM MARIE HAMMOND
  24. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed DYCK-O'NEAL, INC
  25. THE COURT FINDS DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ON THE BASIS OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS AND THE DOCTRINE OF LACHES LACKING, SAID MOTION IS DENIED. AS DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RESTS SOLELY ON THE ISSUE OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ARGUMENTS CITED, ABOVE, THE COURT FINDS PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IS WELL-TAKEN AND GRANTED. THIS IS A FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER. THERE IS NO JUST CAUSE FOR DELAY. JDT
  26. F.A.O. NOTICES ISSUED BY REGULAR MAIL. PASTOR, SUZANA
  27. F.A.O. NOTICES ISSUED BY REGULAR MAIL. ESSAD, SCOTT CARSON
  28. F.A.O. NOTICES ISSUED BY REGULAR MAIL. KOZLINA, MIKE
  29. F.A.O. NOTICES ISSUED BY REGULAR MAIL. HAMMOND, KIM MARIE
  30. F.A.O. NOTICES ISSUED BY REGULAR MAIL. DYCK-O'NEAL, INC
  31. PLAINTIFF'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  32. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  33. PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  34. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BASED UPON STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
  35. FAULKNER DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT FOR MSJ
  36. DEFENDANT EXHIBIT A
  37. DEFENDANT EXHIBIT B
  38. DEFENDANT EXHIBIT C
  39. DEFENDANT EXHIBIT D
  40. DEFENDANT EXHIBIT E
  41. DEFENDANT EXHIBIT F
  42. DEFENDANT EXHIBIT G
  43. DEFENDANT EXHIBIT I
  44. DEFENDANT EXHIBIT J
  45. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  46. MSJ AFFIDAVIT
  47. CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE. TRIAL DATE: NOVEMBER 14, 2023 AT 8:00 A.M. FINAL PRETRIAL DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2023 AT 10:00 A.M. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DUE: JUNE 2, 2023 RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DUE: JUNE 30, 2023 REPLY BRIEF, IF NECESSARY, DUE: JULY 7, 2023. JDT
  48. TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED IN THIS MATTER ON APRIL 6, 2023 AT 8:30 A.M. SEE THIS ORDER FOR TELEPHONE INSTRUCTIONS. JDT
  49. TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED ON MARCH 2, 2023 AT 8:30 A.M. SEE ORDER FOR TELEPHONE INSTRUCTIONS. JDT
  50. A STATUS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED IN THIS MATTER FOR FEBRUARY 15, 2023 AT 9:00 A.M. VIA ZOOM VIDEO CONFERENCE. JDT
  51. STATUS REPORT OF MEDIATION. DAH
  52. STATUS REPORT OF MEDIATION ANOTHER MEDIATION CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 16, 2022 AT 10:30 A.M. THIS MEDIATION CONFERENCE WILL BE CONDUCTED VIA ZOOM. DAH
  53. This Case was transferred from Judge: CORRIGALL JONES, AMY to Judge: TOWELL, JENNIFER D.
  54. CASE REFERRED TO MEDIATION ON DECEMBER 7, 2022 AT 10:30AM. TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE SET FOR DECEMBER 12, 2022 AT 8:30AM. JMO for ACJ
  55. MEDIATION NOTICE. CONFERENCE DATE SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 7, 2022 AT 10:30 A.M.
  56. DEFENDANT'S PRETRIAL STATEMENT
  57. PLAINTIFF'S PRETRIAL STATEMENT
  58. A FIRST STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING IS SET FOR SEPTEMBER 20, 2022 AT 8:30 A.M. BY TELEPHONE. JMO
  59. DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
  60. EXHIBIT--OHIO SECSTATE SEARCH
  61. THE FINDS DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT TO BE WITHOUT MERIT. THE COURT FINDS THAT THE PLAINTIFF HAS SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLIED WITH CIV.R. 10(D)(1) BY PROVIDING THE DEFENDANT WITH ADEQUATE NOTICE OF THE CLAIM AGAINST HIM. THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS THE DEFENDANT TO FILE HIS ANSWER TO THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. ACJ
  62. PLAINTIFF, DYCK- O'NEAL, INC.'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMEN
  63. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED AN EXTENSION TIME, UNTIL MAY 2, 2022, IN WHICH TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT. ACJ
  64. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEY SUZANA PASTOR AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF, DYCK-O'NEAL, INC.
  65. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
  66. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEY SCOTT C ESSAD AS COUSNEL FOR THE DEFENDANT MIKE KOZLINA
  67. MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
  68. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEY SCOTT C ESSAD AS COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT MIKE KOZLINA
  69. Certified Mail Service - Served MIKE KOZLINA
  70. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL BY Certified Mail KOZLINA, MIKE
  71. CIVIL COMPLAINT FILED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more