Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- Comment of non-military status
- Comment received: re: Alternative Dispute Resolution
- View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 05/17/2022 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: J
- View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment TO: attorney, Nathan F Smith RE: Civil Case Cover Sheet REASON: required page 2 not filed
- Unserved Unserved Unserved Unserved
- View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM
- View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM
- Comment 1b does not fully conform to the Complaint
- Comment 1b does not fully conform to the Complaint
- Comment 1b does not fully conform to the Complaint
- Comment 1.b does not conform fully to Complaint
- Comment as to Antonio Robert Gonzales on Complaint filed 01/28/2022
- Comment attorney's printed name is missing from page 1 - field left blank/incomplete.
- Comment As to Aimee Kathrina Gonzales on complaint filed 1/28/22
- Comment As to Crystal Demmon and complaint filed 1/28/22
- View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
- Comment APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
- Comment DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF IN SUPPORT OF GENERAL JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE AGAINST DEFENDANTS
- Comment Request for Judicial Notice
- Comment Declaration Attorney fees, costs and Disbursements
- Comment DECLARATION OF NON-MILITARY STATUS
- View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Request for Court Judgment 1b , and #2 incomplete and missing Dismissal of Does required prior to Judgment
- Comment Without Prejudice as to Does 1-25 -ONLY-
- Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Comment ***GRANTED IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED as follows: 1. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE FOR THE NOTEHOLDERS FOR THE CWABS, INC., ASSET- BACKED NOTES SERIES 2005-SD2 ("Plaintiff") and against Defendants AIMEE KATHRINA GONZALES, ANTONIO ROBERT GONZALES, and CRYSTAL DEMMON
- View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Judgment Entered
- View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Writ of Sale and memorandum of Costs: The Total Judgment amount on line 11 of the Writ does not conform to Judgment amount on the Judgment Paragraph 9 line 8. The Attorney fees and costs were included in this judgment amount. On the Judgment Paragraph 17 line 17-18 the Attorney fees and costs are mentioned again for the same amount already added in the Judgment in paragraph 9. Please correct the writ to conform to Judgment amount.
- Comment After Judgment
- Comment Writ of Sale; County of Kern
- Comment AFTER JUDGMENT
- Comment COUNTY OF KERN
- View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment As to Writ: 1. #3 is incomplete. 2. Daily interest is incorrect. Per #19a - at the legal rate on 15. As to Memo: 1. Outdated filing form. Please use the January 1, 2024 newly revised MC-012 form. 2. #3 on page 2 is missing a checkmark. Please review and revise accordingly.
- Comment ***ACCEPTED IN ERROR***
- Comment To: Nathan F. Smith, Esq. For: Memorandum of Credits, Interest and Costs Filed, Reason: Accepted in error, please review item 3 "remaining due in the amount of", this amount listed does not conform to item 16 on the Writ of Posession.
- View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment 1. Memorandum of Costs filed on 4/17/24 was accepted in error (refer to rejection notice on 4/19/24). Please file an amended memo of costs. 2. Writ not field.
- Comment After Judgment
- Comment COUNTY OF KERN
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In