Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Arkansas Unified County

Court

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-02-01
Status FINAL - FINAL
Type Ia Interlocutory Appeal
Docket 125 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Lakewood Health & Rehab Center, Llc|Nursing Consultants, Inc|Morton, Michael|Dougherty, Kirkman T|Randall, Stephanie Irby|Almefty Hernandez, Kynda|Hatfield, Jeffrey Wahl|Central Arkansas Nursing Centers, Inc
Defendant Reddick, Brian David|Ashby, Lula|Swindle, Matthew David
Photo of Hon. Gray Alice Sprinkle Brandon J Harrison

Judge

Hon. Gray Alice Sprinkle Brandon J Harrison

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. APPELLATE COVERSHEET
  2. Appellate court coversheet.
  3. No Images
  4. RECORD LODGED $
  5. E-filed record. Pleadings: 1 volume; 232 pages. Transcript: 1 volume; 90 pages. No physical exhibits.
  6. No Images
  7. LOWER COURT INFORMATION
  8. none.
  9. No Images
  10. BRIEFING COMMENCED
  11. Appellants' brief due March 13, 2022. Briefing notice sent to Kynda Almefty and Brian Reddick.
  12. BRIEFING NOTICE
  13. PAYMENT RECEIVED
  14. A Payment of $165.00 was made on receipt ARCA4331.
  15. No Images
  16. RECUSAL
  17. none.
  18. No Images
  19. 7 DAY BRIEF EXTENSION
  20. Appellants' brief is due March 20, 2022 after 7-day brief extension.
  21. LETTER
  22. APPELLANT'S BRIEF
  23. Appellant's Brief e-filed by attorney. Paper copies not required.
  24. BRIEF
  25. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  26. Entry of appearance by Matthew Swindle on behalf of the appellee.
  27. MOTION
  28. MOTION EXTENSION OF TIME
  29. Motion for extension of time to file appellees' brief.
  30. MOTION
  31. BRIEF EXTENSION
  32. Appellees' brief is due May 17, 2022.
  33. ORDER
  34. MOTION EXTENSION OF TIME
  35. Appellees' motion for extension of time to file brief.
  36. MOTION
  37. BRIEF EXTENSION
  38. Appellees' brief is due June 1, 2022.
  39. ORDER
  40. APPELLEE'S BRIEF
  41. Appellee's Brief e-filed by attorney. Paper copies not required.
  42. BRIEF
  43. 7 DAY BRIEF EXTENSION
  44. Reply brief is due June 23, 2022 after 7-day brief extension.
  45. LETTER
  46. REPLY BRIEF
  47. Appellant's Reply Brief e-filed by attorney. Paper copies not required.
  48. BRIEF
  49. CASE SUBMITTED
  50. none.
  51. No Images
  52. MAJORITY OPINION
  53. Affirmed. Virden and Hixson, JJ., agree.
  54. OPINION
  55. OPINION PANEL
  56. none.
  57. No Images
  58. PETITION FOR REHEARING $
  59. Appellants' petition for rehearing.
  60. PETITION
  61. PAYMENT RECEIVED
  62. A Payment of $25.00 was made on receipt ARCA4916.
  63. No Images
  64. RESPONSE TO PET FOR REHEARING
  65. Response to petition for rehearing.
  66. RESPONSE
  67. PET FOR REHEARING SUBMITTED
  68. Appellants' petition for rehearing.
  69. No Images
  70. LETTER ORDERS - COA
  71. Appellants' petition for rehearing is denied. Harrison, C.J., not participating.
  72. ORDER
  73. PETITION FOR REVIEW $
  74. Appellants' petition for review.
  75. PETITION
  76. PAYMENT RECEIVED
  77. A Payment of $25.00 was made on receipt ARCA4961.
  78. No Images
  79. RESPONSE TO PET FOR REVIEW
  80. Appellee's response to petition for review.
  81. RESPONSE
  82. EXHIBITS
  83. PETITION FOR REVIEW SUBMITTED
  84. none.
  85. No Images
  86. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED
  87. Wood, J., not participating.
  88. No Images
  89. LETTER ORDERS - SC
  90. Appellants' petition for review is denied. Wood, J., not participating.
  91. ORDER
  92. MANDATE TO CLERK
  93. none.
  94. Mandate

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more