Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cherokee County

Court

Cherokee County

Georgia

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-01-11
Status CL
Type Restraining Petition
Docket 42 entries
Disposition Judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Cosme , Gerardo | Cosme Services Llc ,
Defendant Miguel , David | Miguel Services Llc ,
Photo of Hon. M ANTHONY BAKER

Judge

Hon. M ANTHONY BAKER

Cherokee County (GA)

Georgia

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. COMPLAINT FILED
  2. GENERAL INFORMATION FORM
  3. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER / INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION AND SUPPORTING BRIEF
  4. REQUEST FOR AN IMMEDIATE HEARING ON THEIR MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RETRAINING ORDER/ INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION
  5. SUMMONS - DAVID MIGUEL
  6. SUMMONS - MIGUEL SERVICES LLC
  7. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE -- DAVID MIGUEL -1/13/2022
  8. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE -MIGUEL SERVICES LLC -1/13/2022
  9. NOTICE O FILING PROPOSED RULE NISI SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION
  10. RULE NISI - MOTIONS HEARING - ATTY CHARLES DALZIEL
  11. RULE NISI- MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION- JUDGE BAKER
  12. ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM
  13. JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION
  14. AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID MIGUEL
  15. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION
  16. RULE 5.2 CERTIFICATE OF DISCOVERY
  17. RULE 5.2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVING DISCOVERY
  18. RULE 5.2 CERTIFICATE OF DISCOVERY
  19. RULE 5.2 CERTIFICATE OF DISCOVERY
  20. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION
  21. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE -WITHDRAWAL OF ERRONEOUSLY FILED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
  22. WITHDRAWAL OF ERRONEOUSLY FILED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
  23. NOTICE OF HEARING - CALENDAR CALL - JUDGE BAKER
  24. DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE
  25. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  26. DEFENDANTS' BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  27. DEFENDANTS' STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS, THEORY OF DEFENSE AND THEORY OF RECOVERY ON COUNTERCLAIM
  28. REQUEST FOR A HEARING
  29. AMENDED COMPLAINT
  30. DEFENDANTS' OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR HEARING
  31. RULE NISI - MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - JUDGE BAKER
  32. RULE NISI - MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - JUDGE BAKER
  33. AMENDED COMPLAINT
  34. PLF'S MOTION FOR ORDER PERMITTING WITHDRAWAL OF ADMISSIONS CAUSED BY FAILURE TO RESPOND TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION AND RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
  35. AFFIDAVIT OF GERARDO COSME
  36. PLAINTIFF' SECOND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  37. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  38. PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS AND BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  39. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO WITHDRAW ADMISSIONS
  40. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFT'S PROPOSED ORER IN DEFT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  41. ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  42. DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more