Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Shelby Chancery County

Court

Shelby Chancery County

Tennessee

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-01-24
Status CBSATISFY - Cost bill satisfied
Type Jr Pet/judicial Review
Docket 58 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Bearden, Michelle M
Defendant Tennessee Department Of Labor And Workforce Development
Photo of Hon. Perry Gadson W

Judge

Hon. Perry Gadson W

Shelby County (TN)

Tennessee

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  2. none.
  3. COMPLAINT FILED
  4. Petition for Judicial Review
  5. Process issued other (T)
  6. Summons Issued to Respondent Tennessee Department of Labor
  7. Exhibits (T)
  8. Exhibit 1 to Petition for Judicial Review-Appeal Tribunal Decision of Hearing Authority
  9. PAYMENT RECEIVED
  10. A Payment of $224.08 was made on receipt CHCH125920.
  11. Case set (T)
  12. PETITION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW SET ON 02/28/22 AT 2 PM VIA ZOOM
  13. FIAT
  14. FIAT SIGNED FOR NOTICE OF HEARING SET FOR FEBRUARY 28, 2022 AT 2 PM
  15. Affidavit (T)
  16. Declaration of Mailing
  17. Exhibits (T)
  18. Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Mailing-Return Receipt
  19. Exhibits (T)
  20. Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Mailing-US Postal Service Tracking Information
  21. Answer (T)
  22. ANSWER OF DEFENDANT
  23. Notice without service
  24. Notice of Filing Certified Administrative Record
  25. Motion (T)
  26. Motion to Dismiss
  27. Certificate filed (T)
  28. Certified Administrative Record [Redacted]
  29. Case continued certain (T)
  30. PETITION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW SET ON 02/28/22 AT 2 PM VIA ZOOM, CONTINUED TO APRIL 7, 2022 AT 10 AM VIA ZOOM
  31. Case set (T)
  32. WRIT OF HEARING ON PETITION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW SET ON MAY 13, 2022 AT 10:30 AM VIA ZOOM
  33. Response (T)
  34. Petitioner's Response in Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Petitioner's Petition for Judicial Review
  35. Response (T)
  36. Commissioner's Response to Petitioner's Responsive Pleading Filed on March 29, 2022
  37. Calendar strike (T)
  38. PETITION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW SET ON 02/28/22 AT 2 PM VIA ZOOM, CONTINUED TO APRIL 7, 2022 AT 10 AM VIA ZOOM PLEASE STRIKE - RESET FOR MAY 13, 2022 AT 10:30
  39. Memorandum (T)
  40. Petitioner's Memorandum in Support of Petitioner's Petition for Judicial Review
  41. Brief (T)
  42. Respondent's Brief and Case Law
  43. Case continued certain (T)
  44. PETITION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW SET MAY 13, 2022 AT 10:30 continued to A STATUS CONFERENCE ON JUNE 14, 2022 AT 2 PM ZOOM
  45. Brief (T)
  46. Petitioner's Supplemental Brief in Support of Her Response in Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Petitioner's Petition for Judicial Review
  47. Response (T)
  48. Response to Petitioner's Post-Hearing Supplemental Brief
  49. Granted (G)
  50. Petitioner's Response in Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Petitioner's Petition for Judicial Review SET ON JUNE 14, 2022 AT 2 PM VIA ZOOMM GRANTED - FINAL ORDER EXPECTED
  51. Order (T)
  52. ORDER OF DISMISSAL DUE TO LACK FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
  53. Dismissal
  54. ORDER OF DISMISSAL DUE TO LACK FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION ENTERED ON 07/07/22 COSTS TO THE PETITIONER
  55. Cost bill prepared/sent (T)
  56. $14 OWED BY PLTF; PAY $10 C/M, $4 SEF
  57. PAYMENT RECEIVED
  58. A Payment of -$14.00 was made on receipt CHCH129961.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more