Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of San Diego Court

Court

San Diego Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-11-16
Status Judgment Satisfied
Type Other Real Property
Docket 19 entries
Disposition SATISFIED

Parties

Plaintiff Farhoumand, Esmail
Defendant Margaret Ann Nagle As Trustees Of The Rex Heinke And Margaret Nagle Living Trust
Photo of Hon. Keri Katz

Judge

Hon. Keri Katz

San Diego County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Satisfaction of Judgment - full filed by FARHOUMAND, ESMAIL; ISSA FARHOUMAND AS TRUSTEE OF THE ISSA FARHOUMAND FAMILY TRUST DATED APRIL 21 2015.
  2. Memorandum of Costs (Summary) filed by MARGARET ANN NAGLE AS TRUSTEES OF THE REX HEINKE AND MARGARET NAGLE LIVING TRUST; REX S HEINKE AS TRUSTEES OF THE REX HEINKE AND MARGARET NAGLE LIVING TRUST.
  3. Notice - Other (of Dismissal of Action by Plaintiffs) filed by FARHOUMAND, ESMAIL; ISSA FARHOUMAND AS TRUSTEE OF THE ISSA FARHOUMAND FAMILY TRUST DATED APRIL 21 2015.
  4. Notice of Entry of Dismissal filed by FARHOUMAND, ESMAIL; ISSA FARHOUMAND AS TRUSTEE OF THE ISSA FARHOUMAND FAMILY TRUST DATED APRIL 21 2015.
  5. Summary Judgment / Summary Adjudication (Civil) scheduled for 05/13/2022 at 08:30:00 AM at Central in C-74 Keri Katz was vacated.
  6. Civil Case Management Conference scheduled for 07/08/2022 at 10:30:00 AM at Central in C-74 Keri Katz was vacated.
  7. Complaint dismissed without prejudice as to FARHOUMAND, ESMAIL .
  8. Complaint dismissed without prejudice as to ISSA FARHOUMAND AS TRUSTEE OF THE ISSA FARHOUMAND FAMILY TRUST DATED APRIL 21 2015.
  9. Complaint dismissed without prejudice as to MARGARET ANN NAGLE AS TRUSTEES OF THE REX HEINKE AND MARGARET NAGLE LIVING TRUST.
  10. Complaint dismissed without prejudice as to REX S HEINKE AS TRUSTEES OF THE REX HEINKE AND MARGARET NAGLE LIVING TRUST.
  11. Request for Dismissal without Prejudice - Entire Action filed by FARHOUMAND, ESMAIL; ISSA FARHOUMAND AS TRUSTEE OF THE ISSA FARHOUMAND FAMILY TRUST DATED APRIL 21 2015.
  12. Motion Hearing (Civil) scheduled for 01/07/2022 at 08:30:00 AM at Central in C-74 Keri Katz was vacated.
  13. Proof of Service (of answer) filed by MARGARET ANN NAGLE AS TRUSTEES OF THE REX HEINKE AND MARGARET NAGLE LIVING TRUST; REX S HEINKE AS TRUSTEES OF THE REX HEINKE AND MARGARET NAGLE LIVING TRUST.
  14. Answer (to complaint) filed by MARGARET ANN NAGLE AS TRUSTEES OF THE REX HEINKE AND MARGARET NAGLE LIVING TRUST; REX S HEINKE AS TRUSTEES OF THE REX HEINKE AND MARGARET NAGLE LIVING TRUST.
  15. Summary Judgment / Summary Adjudication (Civil) scheduled for 05/13/2022 at 08:30:00 AM at Central in C-74 Keri Katz.
  16. Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (Carrie Bolding - Granted) filed by The Superior Court of San Diego.
  17. Minutes finalized for Motion Hearing (Civil) heard 12/22/2021 01:30:00 PM.
  18. Motion Hearing (Civil) continued pursuant to Court's motion to 01/07/2022 at 08:30AM before Judge Keri Katz.
  19. Tentative Ruling for Motion Hearing (Civil) published.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more