Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Hartford County

Court

Hartford County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-11-09
Type T 71 Torts Fire Damage
Docket 59 entries

Parties

Plaintiff American Strategic Insurance Company A/s/o Dianne Mancini And Matthew Mancini
Defendant Fire Finesse Llc|Carlos Solis D/b/a Absolute Floor & Wall Sysytems|Non Appearing|U.s. Insulation Corp.|Carlos Solis D/b/a Absolute Floor & Wall Systems|Non Appearing
Photo of Hon. &nbsp;</span>

Judge

Hon. &nbsp;</span>

Hartford County

Connecticut

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. APPEARANCE Appearance
  5. RETURN OF SERVICE
  6. MOTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 RESULT: Denied 12/20/2021 BY THE CLERK
  7. ORDER RESULT: Denied 12/20/2021 BY THE CLERK
  8. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  9. ANSWER
  10. CLAIM FOR JURY OF 6
  11. CERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  12. REQUEST TO AMEND AND AMENDMENT to answer and special defense
  13. SCHEDULING ORDER BY AGREEMENT C50,T02,T03,T11,T12,T61,V01,V04, V09 CASES RESULT: Order 3/15/2022 HON SUSAN COBB
  14. ORDER RESULT: Order 3/15/2022 HON SUSAN COBB
  15. ORDER TMC Order RESULT: Order 3/15/2022 HON SUSAN COBB Last Updated: Additional Description - 03/15/2022
  16. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT FOR APPORTIONMENT AS SERVED CGS SEC 52-102b
  17. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13
  18. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13
  19. MOTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 as to Apportionment Defendant, Carlos Solis, d/b/a Absolute Floor & Wall Systems RESULT: Denied 6/16/2022 BY THE CLERK
  20. ORDER RESULT: Denied 6/16/2022 BY THE CLERK
  21. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  22. AMENDED COMPLAINT
  23. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13
  24. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT FOR APPORTIONMENT AS SERVED CGS SEC 52-102b
  25. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RE: APPORTIONMENT COMPLAINT
  26. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RE: AMENDED COMPLAINT
  27. SUPPLEMENTAL RETURN
  28. REQUEST
  29. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13
  30. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME filed by Plaintiff (Fourth) Doc. 121.00
  31. ANSWER TO APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY COMPLAINT - CGS SEC 52-102B
  32. MOTION TO DISMISS PB 10-30 RE: AMENDED COMPLAINT DATED 5-21-2022 RESULT: Denied 10/3/2022 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  33. ORDER RESULT: Order 9/2/2022 HON SUSAN COBB
  34. ORDER RESULT: Denied 10/3/2022 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  35. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS RE AMENDED COMPLAINT DATED 5-21-22
  36. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 8/18/2022 HON CHARLES REED
  37. ORDER RESULT: Granted 8/18/2022 HON CHARLES REED
  38. OBJECTION by defendant/appor plaintiff, Fire Finesse, LLC to plaintiff's Fifth Motion for Extension of Time RESULT: Sustained 8/18/2022 HON CHARLES REED
  39. ORDER RESULT: Sustained 8/18/2022 HON CHARLES REED
  40. AMENDED WRIT AND SUMMONS
  41. MOTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 as to Apportionment Defendant, Carlos Solis, d/b/a Absolute Floor & Wall Systems RESULT: Granted 8/10/2022 BY THE CLERK
  42. ORDER RESULT: Granted 8/10/2022 BY THE CLERK
  43. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS PB 10-31
  44. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13
  45. OBJECTION to Plaintiff's Sixth Motion to Extension to Respond to 2/2/22 discovery requests
  46. MOTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE – PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD – 13-6/13-9) RESULT: Granted 10/20/2022 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  47. ORDER RESULT: Granted 10/20/2022 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  48. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OBJ TO MOTION TO DISMISS
  49. REPLY TO MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS #130
  50. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13
  51. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Denied 10/20/2022 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  52. ORDER RESULT: Denied 10/20/2022 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  53. OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S SEVENTH MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO 2/2/22 IRP
  54. SCHEDULING ORDER BY AGREEMENT C50,T02,T03,T11,T12,T61,V01,V04, V09 CASES RESULT: Order 10/21/2022 HON SUSAN COBB
  55. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/21/2022 HON SUSAN COBB
  56. ORDER TMC Order RESULT: Order 10/21/2022 HON SUSAN COBB
  57. REQUEST TO AMEND COMPLAINT/AMENDMENT
  58. MOTION FOR NONSUIT FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ORDER
  59. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more