Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2021-11-02
Status Judgment
Type 37 Cv Other Contract Civil Unlimited
Docket 24 entries
Disposition this judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Kern Tulare Water District
Defendant All Persons Interested In The Matter Of The Determination Of The Validity Of The Proceedings Authorizing Execution Of That Certain Contract, Entitled Contract Between The United States Of America And Kern Tulare Water District Providing For Project Water Service And Facilities Repayment , Contract No. 14 06 200 8367 A Ir 5 P
Photo of Hon. Bradshaw, J. Eric

Judge

Hon. Bradshaw, J. Eric

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Comment Ex Parte Application for Order for Publication and Posting of Summons
  2. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Comment Order for Publication and Posting of Summons
  3. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 02/22/2022 Hearing Time: 8:30 am Hearing Department/Division: J
  4. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment TO: Attorney, Scott K Kuny...returned via U.S.P.S. RE: Summons REASON: 'fill in' information in body of Summons needs completed.
  5. Served 11/18/2021
  6. Comment Summons
  7. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re Proof of Service
  8. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; proof of service
  9. Comment of All persons interested in the matter of the determination..., via publication
  10. Comment Premature for Service via Publication parties have 58 days from first day running in the Newspaper.
  11. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Ex Parte Application and Proposed Judgment: Incorrect information in document. Page 5 line 11 states default was entered on December 20, 2021 but default was NOT entered. Please review the bottom of page 1 of Request for Entry of Default.
  12. Comment Premature for service it has only been 54 days since Publishing not counting Holidays.
  13. Comment As to All persons Interested in the Matter of the Determination of the Validity of the Proceedings authorizing execution of that certain contract, entitled "Contract between the United States of America and Kern-Tulare Water District providing for Project" Water Service and Facilities Repayment" Contract NO. 14-06-200-8367A-IR5-P on complaint filed 11/2/21
  14. Comment for Judgment Validating and Confirming Contract and Proceedings
  15. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Comment Validating and Confirming Contract and Proceedings Upon reading and considering the unopposed Ex Parte Application for Judgment requesting the validation and confirmation of Plaintiff KERN-TULARE WATER DISTRICT ("the DISTRICT") certain contract entitled "CONTRACT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND KERN-TULARE WATER DISTRICT PROVIDING FOR PROJECT WATER SERVICE AND FACILITIES REPAYMENT", CONTRACT NO. 14-06-200-8367A-IR5-P (hereinafter referred to as the "Contract"), and related proceedings, and the evidence presented in support thereof, and being fully advised, it satisfactorily appearing to the Court: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: The proceedings leading up to, and including, the authorization of the execution and approval of the Contract by the DISTRICT's Board of Directors, are hereby validated and confirmed, and each and every provision of the Contract is hereby approved, confirmed and declared lawful, valid and binding upon the respective parties thereto.
  16. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment RE: Ex Parte Application/Petition, corrected Ex Parte Application was accepted on 02/14/2022 envelope number 8280587.
  17. Comment for Correction of Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc Hearing date: 02/15/2022 at 8:30 a.m. in Division J
  18. View Document Ex Parte Hearing - Pre-Disposition 02/15/2022 Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 02/14/2022 Plaintiff: KERN TULARE WATER DISTRICT Ex Parte Application for Correction of Judgment NUNC PRO TUNC Kristen 661-377-1760
  19. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  20. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Comment Nunc Pro Tunc Validating and Confirming Contract and Proceedings IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: The proceedings leading up to, and including, the authorization of the execution and approval of the Contract by the DISTRICT's Board of Directors, are hereby validated and confirmed, and each and every provision of the Contract is hereby approved, confirmed and declared lawful, valid and binding upon the respective parties thereto. This Judgment is effective nunc pro tunc as of January 24, 2022.
  21. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Comment Granting Application for Correction of Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc The EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CORRECTION OF JUDGMENT NUNC PRO TUNC ("Application") filed by Petitioner Kern-Tulare Water District ("Petitioner") came on for hearing on February 15, 2022 at 8:30 a.m., Honorable Eric Bradshaw presiding. Having read and considered the and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Application is granted. 2. The Judgment entered on January 24, 2022 shall be amended nunc pro tunc in the following manner: The portion of the judgement's caption which reads "Water Code 50970 and 50979" shall be corrected to read: "Wat. Code, 35855." 3. A separate document, entitled "Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc Validating and Confirming Contract and Proceedings" shall be submitted by counsel for signature and entry by the Court. That Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc shall be retroactively effective as of January 24, 2022, the date of the original Judgment.
  22. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Judgment Entered

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase