Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Alaska Unified

Court

Alaska Unified

Alaska

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-10-20
Status Closed
Type Div Or Cust W/children (4 Be)|Spouses With Minor Children (or Pregnant) Agree On All Issues To End Marriage
Docket 25 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Sorensen, Patricia Lynn
Defendant Ocampo, Jonathan Ricardo
Photo of Hon. Haas Terrence P

Judge

Hon. Haas Terrence P

Bethel Census Area (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. ivil Deficiency Memo mailed re: Motion Filed 12/13/24 Jonathan Ricardo Ocampo (Defendant);
  2. nitial Judicial Assignment
  3. hild Custody Jurisdiction Affidavit
  4. hild Support Guidelines Affidavit
  5. nformation Sheet - Confidential Document per Civil Rule 90.1(f)(1)
  6. ODGED: VS-401 Certificate of Absolute Divorce or Dissolution
  7. omestic Relations Procedural Order and Assignment
  8. etter or Other Correspondence
  9. ffidavit of Proof of Service at Jail Facility
  10. pplication for Default Against: (select party from participant list). Jonathan Ricardo Ocampo (Defendant);
  11. ntry of Default Granted Against: Jonathan Ricardo Ocampo (Defendant);
  12. rder for Incarcerated Defendant to Appear Telephonically
  13. indings of Fact & Conclusions of Law (Divorce with Property and Children)
  14. eason for Returned Mail: Unable to Forward Date Returned Documents Were Distributed: 01/18/23 Type of Document(s) Distributed and Returned Unserved: Order for Incarcerated Defendant to Appear Telephonically Jonathan Ricardo Ocampo (Defendant);
  15. udgment and Decree for Divorce with Children and Property
  16. ivorce Granted After Contested Hearing
  17. hild Support Order - Final
  18. ROCESSED: VS-405 Report of Change of Name
  19. mended Divorce Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law with Children and Property
  20. mended Child Support Order
  21. otion to Modify Filing Fee (Post-Judgment) Patricia Lynn Sorensen (Plaintiff);
  22. otion to Modify Custody, Support or Visitation (Post-Judgment) Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Jonathan Ricardo Ocampo (Defendant); Filing Party: Ocampo, Jonathan Ricardo Case Motion #1
  23. ivil Deficiency Memo mailed re: ACTION NEEDED TO CORRECT FILING You have recently submitted documents related to the above case. These documents are either incomplete or do not follow correct procedures. Please do the following: 1 You must pay $75.00 to reopen this case. Find payment instructions online, or contact your local court clerk. If you can’t pay, fill out the attached Request for Exemption from Payment of Fees (form TF-920) and file it with the court. Civil Deficiency Memo (11/23) Sent on: 02/06/2025 12:40:32.23
  24. otion to Modify Filing Fee (Post-Judgment) Jonathan Ricardo Ocampo (Defendant);
  25. ivil Deficiency Memo mailed re: Motion Filed 10/26/23 Patricia Lynn Sorensen (Plaintiff);

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more