Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2021-09-28
Type P 90 Property All Other
Docket 38 entries
Disposition Judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Selma Miriam|Leslie Ogilvy|Christopher Gazzelli|Removed
Defendant Summit Saugatuck Llc
Photo of Hon. HON MARSHALL BERGER

Judge

Hon. HON MARSHALL BERGER

Hartford County (CT)

Connecticut

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. ADDITIONAL PARTIES PAGE
  4. APPEARANCE Appearance
  5. RETURN OF SERVICE
  6. LAND USE LITIGATION APPLICATION RESULT: Granted 10/15/2021 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  7. ORDER RESULT: Granted 10/15/2021 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  8. OBJECTION to Application for Referral of Case to Land Use Litigation Docket - Docket entry no. 101.00
  9. ORDER re: transfer to land use docket RESULT: Order 10/15/2021 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  10. TRANSFERRED FROM SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD
  11. TRANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD
  12. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Request for conference on or about 10-22-2021 RESULT: Granted 10/20/2021 HON MARSHALL BERGER
  13. ORDER RESULT: Granted 10/20/2021 HON MARSHALL BERGER
  14. ORDER re: assigned to J. Berger RESULT: Order 10/20/2021 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  15. ORDER Scheduling Order RESULT: Order 10/29/2021 HON MARSHALL BERGER
  16. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE Answer and Special Defenses of Summit Saugatuck LLC
  17. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RESULT: Order 5/31/2022 HON MARSHALL BERGER
  18. ORDER See MOD #120.00 RESULT: Order 5/31/2022 HON MARSHALL BERGER
  19. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION Summit Saugatuck LLC's Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment
  20. REQUEST TO REVISE Request to Revise Special Defenses
  21. OBJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE RESULT: Order 12/16/2021 HON MARSHALL BERGER
  22. ORDER RESULT: Order 12/16/2021 HON MARSHALL BERGER
  23. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 12/27/2021 HON MARSHALL BERGER
  24. ORDER RESULT: Granted 12/27/2021 HON MARSHALL BERGER
  25. MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (110.00) RESULT: Order 5/31/2022 HON MARSHALL BERGER
  26. ORDER See MOD #120.00 RESULT: Order 5/31/2022 HON MARSHALL BERGER
  27. REPLY MEMORANDUM In Support of Summary Judgment, Regarding Uniform Common Plan
  28. REPLY MEMORANDUM Plaintiffs' Sur-Reply in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment
  29. STIPULATION
  30. WITHDRAWAL IN PART Withdrawal as to Christopher Gazzelli
  31. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION MSJ #110 granted; MSJ #115 denied; jdmt for Summit RESULT: Order 5/31/2022 HON MARSHALL BERGER
  32. SUMMARY JUDGMENT-DEFENDANT RESULT: HON MARSHALL BERGER
  33. MOTION TO REARGUE/RECONSIDER RESULT: Order 6/21/2022 HON MARSHALL BERGER Last Updated: Result Information - 06/22/2022
  34. ORDER RESULT: Order 6/21/2022 HON MARSHALL BERGER
  35. OBJECTION TO MOTION Objection to Plaintiffs Motion to Reargue, docket entry no. 122..00
  36. REPLY Reply to Objection to Motion to Reargue
  37. APPEAL TO APPELLATE COURT
  38. DRAFT JUDGMENT FILE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.