Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-10-04
Type Cc Other Miscellaneous Actions
Docket 45 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Sellman, Matthew Scott
Defendant Microsoft Corporation
Photo of Hon. Johnson Laura J

Judge

Hon. Johnson Laura J

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. et Filed in Circuit Ct
  2. orrespondence Sent Notice of Entry sent to PETP.
  4. earing Held Plaintiff appears in person. Defendant appears through counsel. This case was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on January 27, 2022. The dismissal became final on February 27, 2022. In April, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Lift Stay Order and a First Amended Complaint. In July, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint, and Motion for Reconsideration. These motions were not timely and are not properly before the Court. The Court attempted to contact Plaintiff regarding his request for translator. This case is closed. /s/ Laura Johnson Associated Entries: 08/09/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled Associated Entries: 08/09/2022 - Motion Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 08/18/2022; 9:00 AM; LAURA J JOHNSON; Christian County Cir Ct Bldg
  6. esponse Filed Microsofts Response to Plaintiffs Motions. Filed By: LAURA BETH LAWSON On Behalf Of: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
  8. otion Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 08/18/2022 - Hearing Held + Scheduled For: 08/18/2022; 9:00 AM; LAURA J JOHNSON; Christian County Cir Ct Bldg
  9. earing Continued/Rescheduled Associated Entries: 07/28/2022 - Motion Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 08/18/2022 - Hearing Held + Hearing Continued From: 08/10/2022; 9:00 AM Motion Hearing
  10. udge/Clerk - Note On 8/9/22 Attorney Lawson left a voicemail that she has spoken to Pro Se to tell him that she is unavailable 8/10/22 for noticed hearing and that Pro se is agreeable to continue 8/10/22 hearing and reschedule on a date that both parties are available.
  12. otion Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 08/09/2022 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled Scheduled For: 08/10/2022; 9:00 AM; LAURA J JOHNSON; Christian County Cir Ct Bldg
  14. otice of Court Hearing Sent NOTICE OF ENTRY MAILED TO DFT.
  15. ertificate of Service CERTIFICATE OF SERVICES Filed By: MATTHEW SCOTT SELLMAN
  16. otice of Hearing Filed NOTICE OF HEARING SET FOR 8-10 AT 9:00 A.M. Filed By: MATTHEW SCOTT SELLMAN
  18. otice of Court Hearing Sent
  19. udge/Clerk - Note JUDGE IS NOT AVAILABLE ON 7-20-2022. PLAINTIFF TO FILE NEW NOTICE OF HEARING WITH NEW DATE.
  20. ertificate of Service Filed By: MATTHEW SCOTT SELLMAN
  21. otion to Reconsider MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Filed By: MATTHEW SCOTT SELLMAN
  22. otion for Leave MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Filed By: MATTHEW SCOTT SELLMAN
  23. otice of Hearing Filed Filed By: MATTHEW SCOTT SELLMAN
  24. otice of Hearing Filed Filed By: MATTHEW SCOTT SELLMAN
  25. ther Proposed Document Filed Filed By: MATTHEW SCOTT SELLMAN
  26. otion Filed MOTION TO LIFT STAY ORDER Filed By: MATTHEW SCOTT SELLMAN
  27. equest Filed Filed By: MATTHEW SCOTT SELLMAN
  28. ertificate of Service Filed By: MATTHEW SCOTT SELLMAN
  29. orrespondence Sent Notice mailed to PET at address on file
  30. ismiss by Ct w/o Prejudice
  31. earing Held Defendant appears through counsel. Plaintiff does not appear. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Motion to Compel Arbitration or, in the alternative, to Stay Action is sustained, and Plaintiff's Petition is dismissed without prejudice. The Microsoft Services Agreement contains a binding arbitration agreement, and this case must first be submitted to arbitration. /s/ Laura Johnson Associated Entries: 01/11/2022 - Motion Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 01/27/2022; 9:00 AM; LAURA J JOHNSON; Christian County Cir Ct Bldg
  32. udge/Clerk - Note The 38th Judicial Circuit, [Divisions 1 & 2 only], is conducting a pilot program of a feature on Case.net that allows parties and counsel to appear virtually with ease. The feature is a link called "Virtual Hearing Room", and it allows parties and counsel to immediately access a proceeding remotely. To access the Virtual Hearing Room link, first enter the case number in the Case Number search on Case.net. When the case is displayed, clink on "Scheduled Hearings & Trial". You will see the Virtual Hearing Room link. Click on that to attend the proceeding remotely. Please register/sign in as yourself and mute your microphone until your case is called. All routine civil motions as of 10/28/21 will be heard via the virtual hearing room only. Should this not be a possibility, please contact the Judge's clerk. jrt
  33. otion Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 01/27/2022 - Hearing Held + Scheduled For: 01/27/2022; 9:00 AM; LAURA J JOHNSON; Christian County Cir Ct Bldg
  34. otice of Hearing Filed Notice of Hearing. Filed By: LAURA BETH LAWSON On Behalf Of: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
  35. uggestions in Support Suggestions In Support of Defendant Microsoft Corporations Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint. Filed By: LAURA BETH LAWSON On Behalf Of: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
  36. otion to Compel Arbitration Motion to Compel Arbitration. Filed By: LAURA BETH LAWSON
  37. ntry of Appearance Filed Entry of Appearance. Filed By: LAURA BETH LAWSON On Behalf Of: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
  38. ummons Issued-Circuit Document ID: 21-SMOS-45, for MICROSOFT CORPORATION. MAILED TO THURSTON COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT WITH SERVICE FEE ATTACHED.
  39. orrespondence Filed Filed By: MATTHEW SCOTT SELLMAN
  40. orrespondence Sent Notice of Entry mailed to Petitioner at last known address
  41. udge/Clerk - Note This case is waiting for service fee for summons to be issued.
  42. rder Finding that Plaintiff lacks sufficient resources to pay the filing fee in this case, Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed as a Poor Person is sustained. Plaintiff's Petition may be filed without payment of the filing fee. /s/ Judge Laura Johnson
  43. udge Assigned
  44. ot to Proc In Forma Pauperis INFORMA PAUPERIS. SENT TO JUDGE FOR REVIEW.
  45. onfid Filing Info Sheet Filed

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more