Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Lorain Co

Court

Lorain Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-10-05
Type Married But Separated
Docket 25 entries
Disposition Judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Lorain County Children Services|P|Lorain County Djfs/csea|N/a|P|Minor Child A.m.g.|P
Defendant N/a|P|N/a|P|Grondin Jr, Dino Paul|P
Photo of Hon. Janik, Judge Frank

Judge

Hon. Janik, Judge Frank

Lorain County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS/COMPLAINT FOR SUPPORT/REQUEST FOR SERVICE/NOTICE OF HEARING/EXHIBIT FILED BY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
  2. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE FILED.
  3. PERSONAL IDENTIFIER FILED
  4. PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE ELECTRONIC COPY OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS PURSUANT TO OH.CIV.R.36(A) (NO CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE)
  5. SUMMONS/COMPLAINT/NOTICE/EXHIBIT ISSUED TO: (PS) FROM PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE FOR SERVICE UPON DINO PAUL GRONDIN JR
  6. RETURN OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS/COMPLAINT SERVED UPON DINO PAUL GRONDIN JR ON 10-7-21 FILED BY PROS' PROCESS SERVER
  7. PLAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS AND REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED BY LAUREN M HASE, ASSISTANT COUNTY PROSECUTOR
  8. THE COURT HEARBY ORDERS THAT PLAINTIFF IS NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ITS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT, UNTIL AND UNLESS SUCH TIME AS DEFENDANT REQUESTS SAID ELECTRONIC COPY FROM PLAINTIFF (FJJ) (CC PROS - CNS)
  9. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE FILED.
  10. PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS SENT ORDINARY MAIL TO: DINO PAUL GRONDIN JR
  11. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE HELD VIA ZOOM. DEFENDANT FAILED TO APPEAR. LORAIN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. SEE JOURNAL. (MAG ORDER JR) CC: APA, CSEA, DEFT
  12. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/BRIEF IN SUPPORT/NOTICE OF FILING/PROOF OF SERVICE/EXHIBITS FILED BY LORAIN COUNTY PROS JACOB PULLAR
  13. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HAVING BEEN FILED IN NOVEMBER 2021 MATTER IS SET FOR FILE REVIEW BY THE MAGISTRATE ON 1-21-22. PARTIES AND COUNSEL SHALL NOT APPEAR ON THE FILE REVIEW DATE OF (DATE), AS EVIDENCE WILL NOT BE TAKEN ON THAT DATE. SEE JRNL. (MAG ORDER)(TDL) CC: PROS, CSEA, DEFT
  14. NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DEFENDANT'S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS, EXHIBITS AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED BY ATTY JESSICA A L CAMARGO
  15. AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO OHIO CIVIL RULE 12(B), AND O.R.C.2151.235, INSTANTER, NOTICE OF HEARING, BRIEF AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED BY ATTY JESSICA CAMARGO
  16. AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO OHIO CIVIL RULE 12(B), AND O.R.C.2151.235, INSTANTER, REQUEST FOR CONTESTED HEARING ON JURISDICTION BRIEF AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED BY ATTY JESSICA CAMARGO
  17. REPLY TO RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND ATTACHMENTS FILED BY ATTY JESSICA CAMARGO
  18. (MAGISTRATE ORDER) UPON AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS AND DECREES LORAIN COUNTY CHILDREN SERVICES AS THE CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGEE AND DINO PAUL GRONDIN JR AS THE CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGOR FOR THE MINOR CHILD. STARTING AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDER, DEFENDANT SHALL PAY THE SUM OF $113.31 PER MONTH IN CURRENTLY MONTHLY CHILD SUPPORT, PER CHILD, FOR SUPPORT, PLUS PROCESSING FEE AND $10.00 PER MONTH TOWARD ARREARS. SEE JOURNAL. (MAG ORDER TDL) CC: DEFT, PLTF, APA, CSEA
  19. THE COURT HEREBY ADOPTS THE MAGISTRATE'S DECISION. SEE JOURNAL. (FJJ) CC: DEFT, PLTF, CSEA, APA
  20. CIVIL RULE 58 (B) NOTICE SENT ORDINARY MAIL TO: PLTF, DEFT, APA, CSEA
  21. CASE TAXED AND CLOSED - COSTS TO BE PAID BY OBLIGOR PER LOCAL COURT RULE - BILL SENT TO DINO PAUL GRONDIN JR $236.11
  22. MOTION REQUESTING A STAY ON CHILD SUPPORT, EXHIBITS AND NOTICE FILED BY DINO GRONDIN JR
  23. Hearing: MISC. HEARING Originally Scheduled for 03/29/2022 at 10:00AM was Continued to 05/09/2022 at 9:00AM
  24. MATTER BEFORE THE COURT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY CHILD SUPPORT. FOR THE REASON THAT THE COURT'S CONTINUING JURISDICTION WAS NOT INVOKED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CIV.R.75 AS PROPER SERVICE WAS NOT MADE ON THE PARTIES, THIS MATTER IS RESET FOR SERVICE ON 05/09/2022 @ 9:00 A.M. WITH MAGISTRATE LY VIA ZOOM. SEE JOURNAL. (MAG ORDER TDL) CC: DOM SUPP, PLTF, DEFT, CSEA
  25. 30-DAY DELINQUENT COURT COST LETTER SENT TO DINO PAUL GRONDIN JR.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more