Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-10-06
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 125 entries
Disposition DEFAULT

Parties

Plaintiff Newrez Llc D/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Defendant Ted A. Bryant|Susan J. Bryant
Photo of Hon. Kenneth R Callahan

Judge

Hon. Kenneth R Callahan

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE REFUND TO MANLEY, DEAS & KOCHALSKI LLC
  2. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID SHERIFF
  3. DEPOSIT REQUIRED FOR COURT COST TO CLERK $1,500.17 SHERIFF
  4. LEGAL NEWS ABSTRACT $
  5. LEGAL NEWS FEE $
  6. CLERK FEE $5.00
  7. TO COURT: 07/15/2022 ORDER OF SALE RETURNED ENDORSED ADVERT, & SOLD TO: BASERA HOMES LLC ........................................................................................... FOR $111,100.00 DATE OF SALE 05/09/2022 PLEASE SEE ATTACHED IMAGE FOR DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS BY SHERIFF
  8. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714317) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: SUSAN J. BRYANT 1011 SOUTH BELVOIR BOULEVARD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  9. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714316) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: TED A. BRYANT 1011 SOUTH BELVOIR BOULEVARD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  10. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714315) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD J. SYKORA [email protected]
  11. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714314) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD J. SYKORA [email protected]
  12. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714313) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  13. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714312) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  14. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714311) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MELISSA N HAMBLE [email protected]
  15. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714310) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MELISSA N HAMBLE [email protected]
  16. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714309) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL E CARLETON [email protected]
  17. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714308) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL E CARLETON [email protected]
  18. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714307) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MATTHEW P CURRY [email protected]
  19. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714306) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MATTHEW P CURRY [email protected]
  20. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714300) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANGELA D. KIRK [email protected]
  21. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714299) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANGELA D. KIRK [email protected]
  22. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714298) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  23. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714297) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  24. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714296) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KYLE E TIMKEN [email protected]
  25. JUDGMENT ENTRY(47714295) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KYLE E TIMKEN [email protected]
  26. DECREE OF CONFIRMATION (Parcel(s) #70208101) THE SHERIFF HAVING SOLD THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER OF SALE ISSUED TO HIM, THE COURT BEING SATISFIED OF THE LEGALITY OF THE SALE AND THAT THE NOTICE OF THE SALE WAS IN ALL RESPECTS IN CONFORMITY TO LAW, APPROVES AND CONFIRMS THE SAME AND DIRECTS THE SHERIFF TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER TO BASERA HOMES LLC A GOOD AND SUFFICIENT DEED THEREOF. UPON FULL PAYMENT OF THE PURCHASE PRICE, THE PURCHASER WILL BE ENTITLED TO A WRIT OF POSSESSION AGAINST ALL PARTY DEFENDANTS. ALL UNDISPUTED STATE LIENS ARE PROTECTED AS PROVIDED IN R.C. SEC. 2329.192. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS MUST SERVE, IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B), ALL PARTIES NOT IN DEFAULT FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR NOTICE OF THIS JUDGMENT AND ITS DATE OF ENTRY UPON THE JOURNAL AND MUST NOTE THE SERVICE ON THE APPEARANCE DOCKET. NOTICE ISSUED
  27. PROOF OF PUBLICATION FILED. PUBLICATION COST OF $601.20 PREPAID TO LEGAL NEWS.
  28. OOS ORDER OF SALE RETURNED 5/11/2022, SOLD DATE 5/9/2022 SOLD TO: BASERA HOMES LLC FOR $111,100.00
  29. RECORDER'S FEE $1.00
  30. CERTIFICATE OF TITLE $678.00 PAY TO MANLEY, DEAS & KOCHALSKI, LLC
  31. NOTICE FILED BY P1 NEWREZ LLC ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF SALE
  32. NOTICE OF SALE AND APPROVAL OF APPRAISERS' FEES. THE SALE IS SCHEDULED FOR 05/09/2022 AT 9:00 A.M. AT CUYAHOGA.SHERIFFSALEAUCTION.OHIO.GOV. IF NOT SOLD ON 05/09/2022 IT WILL BE RE-OFFERED ON 05/23/2022 PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT EACH APPRAISER NAMED BE COMPENSATED BY THE CLERK OF COURTS, FROM THE FUNDS ON DEPOSIT AS FOLLOWS: JOHN ANDREWS, APPRAISAL COST: $52.43 REGULAR FEE AND MILEAGE. MARK BUTLER, APPRAISAL COST: $50 REGULAR FEE. THOMAS P HOGAN, APPRAISAL COST: $50 REGULAR FEE. FEES TO BE TAXED AS COSTS IN CASE NO. CV-21-954010 DATED THIS 5th DAY OF APRIL, 2022 NOTICE ISSUED NOTICE ISSUED
  33. LAND APPRAISAL OOS
  34. ORDER OF SALE ISSUED TO SHERIFF WITH APPRAISAL PARCEL#(S) 702-08-101
  35. REAL AUCTION
  36. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH
  37. PRAECIPE FOR ORDER OF SALE $820 PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  38. REGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 46988698 RETURNED 03/25/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT BRYANT/SUSAN/J. RETURN TO SENDER NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
  39. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988699) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: TED A. BRYANT 1011 SOUTH BELVOIR BOULEVARD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  40. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988698) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: SUSAN J. BRYANT 1011 SOUTH BELVOIR BOULEVARD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  41. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988697) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KYLE E TIMKEN [email protected]
  42. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988696) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KYLE E TIMKEN [email protected]
  43. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988695) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD J. SYKORA [email protected]
  44. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988694) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD J. SYKORA [email protected]
  45. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988693) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL E CARLETON [email protected]
  46. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988692) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL E CARLETON [email protected]
  47. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988691) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  48. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988690) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  49. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988689) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MATTHEW P CURRY [email protected]
  50. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988688) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MATTHEW P CURRY [email protected]
  51. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988687) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MELISSA N HAMBLE [email protected]
  52. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988686) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MELISSA N HAMBLE [email protected]
  53. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988685) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANGELA D. KIRK [email protected]
  54. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988684) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANGELA D. KIRK [email protected]
  55. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988683) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  56. JUDGMENT ENTRY(46988682) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  57. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S DECISION. ORDER SEE JOURNAL. NOTICE ISSUED
  58. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780160) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: TED A. BRYANT 1011 SOUTH BELVOIR BOULEVARD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  59. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780159) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: SUSAN J. BRYANT 1011 SOUTH BELVOIR BOULEVARD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  60. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780158) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KYLE E TIMKEN [email protected]
  61. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780157) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: KYLE E TIMKEN [email protected]
  62. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780156) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD J. SYKORA [email protected]
  63. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780155) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RICHARD J. SYKORA [email protected]
  64. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780154) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL E CARLETON [email protected]
  65. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780153) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL E CARLETON [email protected]
  66. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780152) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  67. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780151) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANN M JOHNSON [email protected]
  68. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780150) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MATTHEW P CURRY [email protected]
  69. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780149) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MATTHEW P CURRY [email protected]
  70. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780148) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MELISSA N HAMBLE [email protected]
  71. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780147) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MELISSA N HAMBLE [email protected]
  72. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780146) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANGELA D. KIRK [email protected]
  73. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780145) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANGELA D. KIRK [email protected]
  74. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780144) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  75. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION(46780143) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  76. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION WITH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FILED AND SENT TO ALL PARTIES ON SERVICE PAGE.
  77. MOTION FILED FOR P1 NEWREZ LLC JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 MOTION TO CIRCULATE MAGISTRATE'S DECISION 02/16/2022 - GRANTED
  78. DEFAULT HEARING HELD BY MAGISTRATE. PARTICIPATING WERE JUSTIN RITCH, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF, DEFENDANT SUSAN J. BRYANT AND DEFENDANT'S DAUGHTER BETH KNETZER. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. HOWEVER, BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, TO PERMIT TIME FOR THE TITLEHOLDERS TO RELOCATE, THE MAGISTRATE WILL REFRAIN FROM ISSUING A DECISION UNTIL AFTER 2-1-2022. NOTICE ISSUED
  79. NOTICE FILED BY P1 NEWREZ LLC ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF HEARING
  80. TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 11/30/2021 AT 01:15 PM. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE HEARING. THE PARTY MOVING FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST SEND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF THE DEFAULT HEARING AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. THIS NOTICE MUST PROVIDE THE CALL-IN INFORMATION ABOVE. THIS HEARING MAY BE ATTENDED ONLY VIA TELEPHONE. NOTICE ISSUED
  81. NOTICE FILED BY P1 NEWREZ LLC ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF FILING FINAL JUDICIAL REPORT
  82. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 NEWREZ LLC ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 AFFIDAVIT REGARDING MILITARY STATUS
  83. NOTICE FILED BY P1 NEWREZ LLC ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF FILING ENTRY ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S DECISION
  84. NOTICE FILED BY P1 NEWREZ LLC ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF FILING PROPOSED MAGISTRATE'S DECISION
  85. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 11/30/2021 - GRANTED
  86. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 45683093 RETURNED 10/29/2021 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT BRYANT/SUSAN/J. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  87. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 45683092 RETURNED 10/29/2021 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT BRYANT/TED/A. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  88. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 45676690 RETURNED 10/29/2021 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT BRYANT/SUSAN/J. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  89. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 45676689 RETURNED 10/29/2021 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT BRYANT/TED/A. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  90. MAGISTRATE DEAN K HEGYES ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  91. ALL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  92. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  93. AFFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 NEWREZ LLC ATTORNEY MATTHEW P CURRY 0078306 AFFIDAVIT OF MATTHEW P. CURRY
  94. ON 10/14/2021 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED BRYANT/TED/A. BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  95. ON 10/14/2021 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED BRYANT/SUSAN/J. BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  96. NOTICE FILED BY P1 NEWREZ LLC ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF FILING AN AMENDED PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  97. SUMS COMPLAINT(45683093) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SUSAN J. BRYANT 1011 SOUTH BELVOIR BOULEVARD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  98. SUMS COMPLAINT(45683092) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: TED A. BRYANT 1011 SOUTH BELVOIR BOULEVARD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  99. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  100. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  101. WRIT FEE
  102. WRIT FEE
  103. SUMS COMPLAINT(45682983) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: SUSAN J. BRYANT 1011 SOUTH BELVOIR BOULEVARD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  104. SUMS COMPLAINT(45682982) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: TED A. BRYANT 1011 SOUTH BELVOIR BOULEVARD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  105. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  106. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  107. WRIT FEE
  108. WRIT FEE
  109. SUMS COMPLAINT(45676690) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: SUSAN J. BRYANT 1011 SOUTH BELVOIR BOULEVARD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  110. SUMS COMPLAINT(45676689) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: TED A. BRYANT 1011 SOUTH BELVOIR BOULEVARD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  111. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  112. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  113. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  114. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  115. WRIT FEE
  116. WRIT FEE
  117. JUDGE NANCY R MCDONNELL ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  118. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  119. LEGAL RESEARCH
  120. LEGAL NEWS
  121. LEGAL AID
  122. COMPUTER FEE
  123. CLERK'S FEE
  124. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH
  125. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more