Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Alaska Unified

Court

Alaska Unified

Alaska

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-09-27
Status Closed
Type Civil Superior Ct (2 No)|Other Tort
Docket 76 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Rochon, John D
Defendant City Of Nome|Wright, Allen|Reader, Jackie
Photo of Hon. Di Benedetto, Romano D

Judge

Hon. Di Benedetto, Romano D

Utqiagvik Town (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Notice of Completion of Preparation of File to Records Management Services Appellate Court Case No. Notice of File Preparation and Transmittal (8/19) Sent on: 11/10/2023 14:36:50.99
  2. Complaint for Personal Injury and/or Property Damages Not Automobile Related Receipt: 1890891 Date: 09/28/2021
  3. Attorney Information Attorney Barber, Jeffrey J representing Plaintiff(s) Rochon, John D as of 09/27/2021
  4. Amended Complaint Attorney: Barber, Jeffrey J (0111058)
  5. Amended Summons and Notice to Plaintiff of Judicial Assignment
  6. PROOF OF SERVICE
  7. Attorney Information Attorney Singer, Matthew representing Defendant City of Nome as of 12/01/2021
  8. PROOF OF SERVICE
  9. Motion to Consolidate Attorney: Singer, Matthew (9911072) City of Nome (Defendant); Filing Party: City of Nome Case Motion #1
  10. Amended Complaint Attorney: Barber, Jeffrey J (0111058)
  11. Non-Opposition to: Consolidate Attorney: Barber, Jeffrey J (0111058) Case Motion #1: Motion to Consolidate
  12. PROOF OF SERVICE
  13. Civil Deficiency Memo mailed re: Civil Deficiency Memo (8/18) Sent on: 12/17/2021 09:33:47.17
  14. Civil Deficiency Memo mailed re:You have recently submitted documents related to the above case. These documents are either incomplete or do not follow correct procedures. Please do the following: You must file a proposed Order for Entry of Default. Civil Rule 77. E-mailed to: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
  15. Order Granting Motion City of Nome Case Motion #1 Motion to Consolidate
  16. Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Defendant Allen Wright Attorney: Barber, Jeffrey J (0111058) John D Rochon (Plaintiff); Filing Party: Rochon, John D Case Motion #2
  17. Motion to Serve Complaint by Posting on the Alaska Court System Legal Notice's website Attorney: Barber, Jeffrey J (0111058) John D Rochon (Plaintiff); Filing Party: Rochon, John D Case Motion #3
  18. Affidavit of Diligent Inquiry Attorney: Barber, Jeffrey J (0111058) John D Rochon (Plaintiff);
  19. Notice of: Absent Defendant Attorney: Barber, Jeffrey J (0111058) John D Rochon (Plaintiff);
  20. PROOF OF SERVICE
  21. PROOF OF SERVICE
  22. Order Granting Motion Rochon, John D Case Motion #3 Motion to Serve Complaint by Posting on the Alaska Court System Legal Notice's website
  23. Notice to Absent Defendant (service by posting on Alaska Court System's Legal Notice Website) Allen Wright (Defendant);
  24. Order Granting Motion Rochon, John D Case Motion #2 Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Defendant Allen Wright
  25. Completion of Posting on Alaska Court System's Legal Notice Website: Notice to Absent Defendant Posted for four consecutive weeks: [02/05/2022 thru 03/06/2022]
  26. Civil Rule 4 Affidavit of Service by Certified Mail Jeffrey J Barber (Attorney) on behalf of John D Rochon (Plaintiff)
  27. PROOF OF SERVICE
  28. PROOF OF SERVICE
  29. Attorney Information Attorney Singer, Matthew representing Defendant Wright, Allen as of 03/23/2022
  30. Attorney Information Attorney Baxter, Lee C representing Defendant Wright, Allen as of 03/23/2022
  31. Attorney Information Attorney Baxter, Lee C representing Defendant City of Nome as of 03/23/2022
  32. PROOF OF SERVICE
  33. Clerk's Certificate of Service by Posting to the ACS's Legal Notice Website on:2/5/2022-3/6/2022 Allen Wright (Defendant);
  34. PROOF OF SERVICE
  35. Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Attorney: Baxter, Lee C (1510085) Filing Party: Filing Party: City of Nome Filing Party: City of Nome Case Motion #5
  36. PROOF OF SERVICE
  37. Non-Opposition to: City of Nome's Judgment on the Pleadings Attorney: Barber, Jeffrey J (0111058) John D Rochon (Plaintiff); Case Motion #4: Motion for Summary Judgment
  38. Order Granting Motion City of Nome Case Motion #5 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
  39. Defendant's City of Nome and Allen Wright's Motion for Summary Judgment Attorney: Baxter, Lee C (1510085) Attorney: Singer, Matthew (9911072) Filing Party: City of Nome; Wright, Allen Case Motion #6
  40. Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time: Motion for Summary of Judgment Attorney: Barber, Jeffrey J (0111058) John D Rochon (Plaintiff); Filing Party: Rochon, John D Case Motion #7
  41. Order Granting Motion Rochon, John D Case Motion #7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time: Motion for Summary of Judgment
  42. Plaintiff's Second Unopposed Motion to Extend the Deadline for Responding to City of Nome and Allen Wright's Motion for Summary Judgment Attorney: Barber, Jeffrey J (0111058) Filing Party: Rochon, John D Case Motion #8
  43. Order Granting Motion Rochon, John D Case Motion #8 Plaintiff's Second Unopposed Motion to Extend the Deadline for Responding to City of Nome and Allen Wright's Motion for Summary Judgment
  44. Plaintiff's Third Unopposed Motion fo Extend the Deadline for responding to Motion for Summary Judgment Attorney: Barber, Jeffrey J (0111058) Filing Party: Rochon, John D Case Motion #9
  45. Order Granting Motion Rochon, John D Case Motion #9 Plaintiff's Third Unopposed Motion fo Extend the Deadline for responding to Motion for Summary Judgment
  46. Plaintiff's Opposition to City of Nome and Allen Wright's Motion for Summary Judgment Attorney: Barber, Jeffrey J (0111058) Case Motion #6: Defendant's City of Nome and Allen Wright's Motion for Summary Judgment
  47. Plaintiff's Request for Oral Argument on City of Nome and Allen Wright's Motion for Summary Judgment Attorney: Barber, Jeffrey J (0111058) John D Rochon (Plaintiff); ; Jeffrey J Barber (Attorney) on behalf of John D Rochon (Plaintiff) Case Motion #6: Defendant's City of Nome and Allen Wright's Motion for Summary Judgment
  48. Stipulation or Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time Attorney: Singer, Matthew (9911072) City of Nome (Defendant); Allen Wright (Defendant); Filing Party: City of Nome; Wright, Allen Case Motion #10
  49. Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment Attorney: Baxter, Lee C (1510085) Attorney: Singer, Matthew (9911072) Case Motion #6: Defendant's City of Nome and Allen Wright's Motion for Summary Judgment
  50. Notice of Hearing Notice of Hearing Set, Cancelled or Reset (1/23) Sent on: 07/24/2023 11:30:24.32
  51. Order Granting Motion City of Nome Case Motion #10 Stipulation or Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time
  52. Order Granting Motion City of Nome Case Motion #10 Stipulation or Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time
  53. Order Granting Plaintiff's Request for Oral Argument
  54. Order Granting Motion on Record City of Nome Case Motion #6 Defendant's City of Nome and Allen Wright's Motion for Summary Judgment
  55. Reason for Returned Mail or eMail: Bad Address Date Returned Documents Were Distributed: 8/9/23 Type of Document(s) Distributed and Returned Unserved: Order Granting Mtn for Ext. of Time Jackie Reader (Defendant);
  56. Reason for Returned Mail or eMail: Bad Address Date Returned Documents Were Distributed: 8/11/23 Type of Document(s) Distributed and Returned Unserved:Order Grainting Request for Oral Argument Jackie Reader (Defendant);
  57. Proposed Order Granting Defendants City of Nome and Allen Wright's Motion for Summary Judgment Case Motion #6: Defendant's City of Nome and Allen Wright's Motion for Summary Judgment
  58. Order Granting Defendants City of Nome and Allen Wright's Motion for Summary Judgment
  59. Defendants City of Nome and Allen Wright's Notice of Filing Proposed Judgment Attorney: Baxter, Lee C (1510085)
  60. LODGED: Proposed Final Judgment
  61. Plaintiff's Objection to Defendants' [Proposed] Order Granting Defendants City of Nome and Allen Wright's Motion for Summary Judgment Attorney: Barber, Jeffrey J (0111058)
  62. Final Judgment for Defendants City of Nome and Allen Wright
  63. Motion for Attorney Fees Attorney: Baxter, Lee C (1510085) Filing Party: City of Nome; Wright, Allen Case Motion #11
  64. Affidavit of Lee C. Baxter Attorney: Baxter, Lee C (1510085) Case Motion #11: Motion for Attorney Fees
  65. Cost Bill Attorney: Baxter, Lee C (1510085) Filing Party: City of Nome; Wright, Allen Case Motion #12
  66. File Mailed to: Appellate Court Records Office Date Mailed: 10-11-23 Tracking #: 7022 3330 0000 5833 3259
  67. Civil Deficiency Memo mailed re: Plaintiff's Oppostion to Defendant city of Nome and Allen Wright's Motion for Attorneys' Fees Civil Deficiency Memo (1/22) Sent on: 10/18/2023 16:39:31.12
  68. Opposition to Motion (linked to motion) Attorney: Barber, Jeffrey J (0111058) Case Motion #11: Motion for Attorney Fees
  69. Order Granting Motion City of Nome Case Motion #12 Cost Bill
  70. Defendants City of Nome and Allen Wright's Reply in Support of Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs Attorney: Baxter, Lee C (1510085) Case Motion #11: Motion for Attorney Fees
  71. Order Granting Motion City of Nome Case Motion #11 Motion for Attorney Fees
  72. Appeal Filed in the Supreme Court Case No: S-18908
  73. LODGED: Amended Final Judgment City of Nome (Defendant); Allen Wright (Defendant);
  74. Amended Final Judgment
  75. Judgment on the Pleadings for Defendant
  76. Judgment Entered Amended Judgment Amount: 0.00 Pre-Amended Judgment Interest: 0.00 Attorney Fees: 16,133.25 Court Costs: 1,378.59 Other Fees: 0.00 Amended Judgment Total: 17,511.84 Total Accrued Costs: 0.00 Total Accrued Interest: 0.00 Terms: Post Judgment Interest Rate 7.5% Type: Amended Judgment Judge: DiBenedetto, Romano D Amended Judgment Date: 11/09/2023 Amended Judgment Time: 12:00PM Referee: Recommendation Date: Amended Judgment Status: Judgment Entered Amended Judgment For: City of Nome - Defendant Wright, Allen - Defendant Amended Judgment Against: Rochon, John D - Plaintiff ------------------------------------------- Issuance ------------------------------------------- Writ Type: Date Issued: Accrued Interest: Satisfied Amount: ------------------------------------------- Return ------------------------------------------- Processed By: Received From: Accrued Costs: Satisfied Amount: Date Returned: Date Collected: Date Paid: Amended Judgment Satisfied Amount: 0.00 Amended Judgment Balance: 17,511.84 Case Total: 0.00 Case Satisfied Amount: 0.00 Case Balance: 0.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more