Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2021-09-17
Type H 13 Housing Small Claims Housing Rent And/or Damages
Docket 26 entries
Disposition judgment without trial for plaintiff

Parties

Plaintiff Mary Mccarthy Rago|Thomas W. Richardson
Defendant Rachel Guylas|Mathew Yashenko
Photo of Hon. T Bliss Mag

Judge

Hon. T Bliss Mag

Litchfield County (CT)

Connecticut

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. XECUTION RETURNED UNSATISFIED
  2. MALL CLAIMS RETURN / STATEMENT OF SERVICE
  3. ONTINUATION OF PARTIES
  4. XHIBITS
  5. NSWER - SMALL CLAIMS For both defendants Last Updated: Additional Description - 10/12/2021
  6. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/11/2022 T BLISS, MAG
  7. UDGMENT WITHOUT TRIAL FOR PLAINTIFF RESULT: T BLISS, MAG
  8. PPLICATION FOR EXECUTION-WAGES (JD-CV-3) RESULT: Rejected 2/7/2023 BY THE CLERK
  9. RDER RESULT: Rejected 2/7/2023 BY THE CLERK
  10. XECUTION REFILED AS CORRECTED - NO FEE RESULT: Rejected 3/6/2023 BY THE CLERK
  11. RDER RESULT: Rejected 3/6/2023 BY THE CLERK
  12. XECUTION REFILED AS CORRECTED - NO FEE RESULT: Rejected 4/11/2023 BY THE CLERK
  13. RDER RESULT: Rejected 4/11/2023 BY THE CLERK
  14. XECUTION REFILED AS CORRECTED - NO FEE RESULT: Rejected 6/21/2023 BY THE CLERK Last Updated: Result Information - 06/21/2023
  15. RDER RESULT: Rejected 6/21/2023 BY THE CLERK Last Updated: Entry Number - 06/21/2023
  16. PPLICATION FOR EXECUTION-WAGES (JD-CV-3)
  17. XECUTION ISSUED - WAGES
  18. OTION FOR EXEMPTION FROM EXECUTION (JDCV3a/JDCV24A/JDCV5b)
  19. RDER OF NOTICE - SMALL CLAIMS
  20. RDER RESULT: Denied 10/25/2024 MARK LEE, MAG
  21. ETURN OF NOTICE
  22. ETURN OF NOTICE
  23. ETURN OF NOTICE
  24. ETURN OF NOTICE
  25. PPLICATION FOR EXECUTION FINANCIAL INSTITUTION - NATURAL PERSON/INDIVIDUAL (JD-CV-24) Last Updated: Legend Code - 02/07/2025
  26. XECUTION ISSUED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.