Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-21
Status Case Closed
Type Original Proceeding Civil Prohibition
Docket 23 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Transferred from Supreme Court. (COA).
  2. Filed Petition for Writ of Prohibition. (TRANSFERRED FROM THE SUPREME COURT PER 09/03/20 NOTICE). (COA).
  3. Filed Appendix to Petition for Writ. (TRANSFERRED FROM THE SUPREME COURT PER 09/03/20 NOTICE). (COA).
  4. Filed Order Directing Answer. Real Party in Interest's Answer due: 28 days. Petitioner shall have 14 days from service of the answer to file and serve any reply. (COA)
  5. Filed Real Party in Interest's Answer to Writ of Prohibition. (COA)
  6. Filed Real Party in Interest's Appendix - Volume 1. (COA)
  7. Filed Notice of Appearance of Amicus Counsel - Micah S. Echols of Claggett & Sykes Law Firm and A.J. Sharp of Sharp Law Center Appearing as Counsel for Amicus Party Nevada Justice Association. (In support of Real Party in Interest). (SC)
  8. Filed Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief of the Nevada Justice Association (First Request). (SC)
  9. Filed Order Granting Motion. NJA shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file and serve any motion for leave to file a brief of amicus curiae and a copy of the proposed brief. (COA)
  10. Filed Petitioner's Reply Brief in Support of Writ of Prohibition. (COA)
  11. Filed Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief of the Nevada Justice Association (Second Request). (COA)
  12. Filed Petitioner's Opposition to Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief of the Nevada Justice Association. (COA)
  13. Filed Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief of the Nevada Justice Association (In Support of Real Party In Interest Shay Toth) (First Request). (COA)
  14. Filed Amicus Curiae Brief of the Nevada Justice Association (In Support of Real Party in Interest Shay Toth). (COA)
  15. Filed Reply in Support of Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief of the Nevada Justice Association. (COA)
  16. Filed Order Granting Motions. The opposed motion of the Nevada Justice Association for a second extension of time to file a motion to file a brief of amicus curiae is granted. NRAP 26(b)(1)(A). The motion was filed on January 7, 2021. The motion for leave to file a brief of amicus curiae in support of real party in interest is granted. NRAP 29(a). The amicus brief was filed on January 7, 2021. Petitioner shall have 14 days from the date of this order to file and serve any supplemental brief in response to the amicus brief. The supplemental brief shall not exceed 15 pages or the equivalent type-volume limitation. (COA)
  17. Filed Petitioner's Supplemental Brief in Response to Amicus Curiae Brief of the Nevada Justice Association. (SC)
  18. Filed Order Scheduling Oral Argument. This matter is scheduled for oral argument on April 27, 2021, at 3:00 p.m. Oral argument will be held by videoconference. The court will use the BlueJeans videoconferencing system, which requires laptop/desktop/videoconferencing computer internet access and audio and video (web camera) capability. In case technical difficulties develop at any time, the court will conduct the oral argument by teleconference, which will require counsel to have immediate access to a landline phone connection. On or before March 31, 2021, petitioner and real party in interest shall submit to the Clerk of the Court a notice identifying the attorney(s) who will argue the case and the landline and cellular phone numbers and email address of that attorney(s). The notice may be emailed to the court at [email protected]. The attorneys will be required to schedule a session with the Clerk of the Court to test the capabilities of the connection and video equipment approximately one week prior to argument. (COA)
  19. Oral argument held this day. Case submitted for decision. Before the Court of Appeals. 81637-COA. (COA21-MG/BB/JT) (COA).
  20. Filed Authored Opinion. "Petition granted in part and denied in part." Before the Court of Appeals. Author: Tao, J. Majority: Gibbons/Tao/Bulla.138 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 8. Court of Appeals-MG/JT/BB. (COA).
  21. Issued Writ with letter. Original and two copies of writ and two copies of the opinion mailed to Andrew R. Muehlbauer for service upon the Chief Judge, Hon. Carli Lynn Kierny, and Department 2. (COA)
  22. Filed Returned Writ. Original Writ returned. Served on Judge Carli Lynn Kierny and Dept. 2 on March 7, 2022. (COA)
  23. Transferred to Supreme Court. (COA)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.