Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2020-03-10
Status Decided
Type F 5 Felony 5
Docket 90 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff State Of Indiana
Defendant Allen, Latasha Shree
Photo of Hon. Bokota Natalie

Judge

Hon. Bokota Natalie

Lake County (IN)

Indiana

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Case Opened as a New Filing
  2. Case Filed Electronically
  3. Appearance Filed
  4. Information Filed
  5. Probable Cause Affidavit Filed
  6. Probable Cause Found: Order Issued
  7. Warrant or Writ of Attmnt for the Body of a Person Issued
  8. Warrant or Writ of Attmnt for the Body of a Person Served
  9. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  10. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  11. Clerk Administrative Event
  12. Order to Appear
  13. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  14. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  15. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  16. Cash Bond Entered in Clerk's Office
  17. Appearance Filed
  18. Motion Filed
  19. Motion Filed
  20. Motion Filed
  21. Motion Filed
  22. Order Granting
  23. Order Granting
  24. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  25. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  26. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  27. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  28. Initial Hearing
  29. Appearance Filed
  30. Discovery Filed
  31. Answer Filed
  32. Motion for Continuance Filed
  33. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  34. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  35. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  36. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  37. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  38. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  39. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  40. Hearing
  41. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  42. Hearing Journal Entry
  43. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  44. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  45. Motion for Continuance Filed
  46. Motion for Continuance Filed
  47. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  48. Order Granting Motion for Continuance
  49. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  50. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  51. Motion for Continuance Filed
  52. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  53. Order Granting Motion for Continuance
  54. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  55. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  56. Plea Agreement Filed
  57. Waiver of In Person Hearing
  58. Information Filed
  59. Hearing
  60. Motion to Dismiss Filed
  61. Order on Hearing
  62. Order of Confinement (Sentenced)
  63. Notice Issued to Parties
  64. Judgment
  65. Sentenced
  66. Abstract of Judgment Sent to Jail
  67. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  68. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  69. Clerk Administrative Event
  70. Disposition Sent Electronically to Indiana State Police
  71. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  72. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  73. Order of Nunc Pro Tunc Entry
  74. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  75. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  76. First Class Mail Returned
  77. Conditions of Probation
  78. Administrative Event
  79. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties Sentenced ---- 1/12/2021 : Bernard Arnold Carter;Michael P Stryjewski;Nadia Duan Wardrip
  80. Order of Nunc Pro Tunc Entry Court issues nunc pro tunc order correcting order dated 01-12-21 as to credit time only. Order affirmed in all other respects. [pah] Judicial Officer: Bokota, Natalie Noticed: Stryjewski, Michael P Noticed: Wardrip, Nadia Duan Noticed: Lake County Probation Department Order Signed: 01/25/2021
  81. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties Order of Nunc Pro Tunc Entry ---- 1/25/2021 : Lake County Probation Department
  82. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties Order of Nunc Pro Tunc Entry ---- 1/25/2021 : Michael P Stryjewski;Nadia Duan Wardrip
  83. First Class Mail Returned No such number, Bond letter returned
  84. Conditions of Probation Rules of Probation Party: Lake County Probation Department Order Signed: 01/28/2021
  85. Administrative Event POR - No Contact Order - Pretrial Release expired Expired by Automated Service (POR-4593)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix and motion outcomes. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase